131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31338795)
1. 3D Myocardial Scar Prediction Model Derived from Multimodality Analysis of Electromechanical Mapping and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
van den Broek HT; Wenker S; van de Leur R; Doevendans PA; Chamuleau SAJ; van Slochteren FJ; van Es R
J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2019 Dec; 12(6):517-527. PubMed ID: 31338795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three dimensional fusion of electromechanical mapping and magnetic resonance imaging for real-time navigation of intramyocardial cell injections in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction.
van Slochteren FJ; van Es R; Gyöngyösi M; van der Spoel TI; Koudstaal S; Leiner T; Doevendans PA; Chamuleau SA
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 32(5):833-43. PubMed ID: 26883433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of bipolar voltage mapping and magnetic resonance imaging resolution in biventricular scar characterization after myocardial infarction.
López-Yunta M; León DG; Alfonso-Almazán JM; Marina-Breysse M; Quintanilla JG; Sánchez-González J; Galán-Arriola C; Cañadas-Godoy V; Enríquez-Vázquez D; Torres C; Ibáñez B; Pérez-Villacastín J; Pérez-Castellano N; Jalife J; Vázquez M; Aguado-Sierra J; Filgueiras-Rama D
Europace; 2019 Jan; 21(1):163-174. PubMed ID: 30239689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging and late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of chronic myocardial infarction.
Pashakhanloo F; Herzka DA; Mori S; Zviman M; Halperin H; Gai N; Bluemke DA; Trayanova NA; McVeigh ER
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 28122618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myocardial Scar Delineation Using Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Tractography.
Mekkaoui C; Jackowski MP; Kostis WJ; Stoeck CT; Thiagalingam A; Reese TG; Reddy VY; Ruskin JN; Kozerke S; Sosnovik DE
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Feb; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29420216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of myocardial scars: electrophysiological imaging correlates in a porcine infarct model.
Nakahara S; Vaseghi M; Ramirez RJ; Fonseca CG; Lai CK; Finn JP; Mahajan A; Boyle NG; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jul; 8(7):1060-7. PubMed ID: 21354335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of late gadolinium enhancement image acquisition resolution on neural network based automatic scar segmentation.
Hoh T; Margolis I; Weine J; Joyce T; Manka R; Weisskopf M; Cesarovic N; Fuetterer M; Kozerke S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):101031. PubMed ID: 38431078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of scar in cardiac MRI and high-resolution contact mapping of left ventricle in a chronic infarct model.
Thajudeen A; Jackman WM; Stewart B; Cokic I; Nakagawa H; Shehata M; Amorn AM; Kali A; Liu E; Harlev D; Bennett N; Dharmakumar R; Chugh SS; Wang X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):663-74. PubMed ID: 25656924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scar voltage threshold determination using ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging integration in a porcine infarct model: Influence of interelectrode distances and three-dimensional spatial effects of scar.
Tung R; Kim S; Yagishita D; Vaseghi M; Ennis DB; Ouadah S; Ajijola OA; Bradfield JS; Mahapatra S; Finn P; Shivkumar K
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1993-2002. PubMed ID: 27392944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a novel stand-alone software tool for image guided cardiac catheter therapy.
van Es R; van den Broek HT; van der Naald M; de Jong L; Nieuwenhuis ER; Kraaijeveld AO; Doevendans PA; Chamuleau SAJ; van Slochteren FJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 30689193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of 3-Dimensional Architecture of Scar and Surviving Tissue in Ventricular Tachycardia: Insights From High-Resolution Ex Vivo Porcine Models.
Pashakhanloo F; Herzka DA; Halperin H; McVeigh ER; Trayanova NA
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e006131. PubMed ID: 29880529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discordance in Scar Detection Between Electroanatomical Mapping and Cardiac MRI in an Infarct Swine Model.
Kucukseymen S; Yavin H; Barkagan M; Jang J; Shapira-Daniels A; Rodriguez J; Shim D; Pashakhanloo F; Pierce P; Botzer L; Manning WJ; Anter E; Nezafat R
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct; 6(11):1452-1464. PubMed ID: 33121675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multimodality infarct identification for optimal image-guided intramyocardial cell injections.
van Slochteren FJ; van Es R; Koudstaal S; van der Spoel TI; Sluijter JP; Verbree J; Pruim RH; Pluim JP; Leiner T; Doevendans PA; Chamuleau SA
Neth Heart J; 2014 Nov; 22(11):493-500. PubMed ID: 25331760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local Conduction Velocity in the Presence of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Myocardial Wall Thinning: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study in a Swine Model of Healed Left Ventricular Infarction.
Jang J; Whitaker J; Leshem E; Ngo LH; Neisius U; Nakamori S; Pashakhanloo F; Menze B; Manning WJ; Anter E; Nezafat R
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 12(5):e007175. PubMed ID: 31006313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac CT With Delayed Enhancement in the Characterization of Ventricular Tachycardia Structural Substrate: Relationship Between CT-Segmented Scar and Electro-Anatomic Mapping.
Esposito A; Palmisano A; Antunes S; Maccabelli G; Colantoni C; Rancoita PMV; Baratto F; Di Serio C; Rizzo G; De Cobelli F; Della Bella P; Del Maschio A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):822-832. PubMed ID: 26897692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved border sharpness of post-infarct scar by a novel self-navigated free-breathing high-resolution 3D whole-heart inversion recovery magnetic resonance approach.
Rutz T; Piccini D; Coppo S; Chaptinel J; Ginami G; Vincenti G; Stuber M; Schwitter J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1735-1744. PubMed ID: 27549804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic impact of unrecognized myocardial scar in the non-culprit territories by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Omori T; Kurita T; Dohi K; Takasaki A; Nakata T; Nakamori S; Fujimoto N; Kitagawa K; Hoshino K; Tanigawa T; Sakuma H; Ito M
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 28950314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimized CEST cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessment of metabolic activity in the heart.
Zhou Z; Nguyen C; Chen Y; Shaw JL; Deng Z; Xie Y; Dawkins J; Marbán E; Li D
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Nov; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 29191206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Intramyocardial Adipose Tissue on the Accuracy of Endocardial Contact Mapping of the Chronic Myocardial Infarction Substrate.
Samanta R; Kumar S; Chik W; Qian P; Barry MA; Al Raisi S; Bhaskaran A; Farraha M; Nadri F; Kizana E; Thiagalingam A; Kovoor P; Pouliopoulos J
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 29038101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T1 reactivity as an imaging biomarker in myocardial tissue characterization discriminating normal, ischemic and infarcted myocardium.
van Assen M; van Dijk R; Kuijpers D; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1319-1325. PubMed ID: 31093894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
