BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31338847)

  • 1. An additive boundary for group sequential designs with connection to conditional error.
    Xi D; Gallo P
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4656-4669. PubMed ID: 31338847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general formulation for a one-sided group sequential design.
    Moser BK; George SL
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(6):519-28. PubMed ID: 16422312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Group sequential design for historical control trials using error spending functions.
    Wu J; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Mar; 30(2):351-363. PubMed ID: 31718458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group sequential designs using a family of type I error probability spending functions.
    Hwang IK; Shih WJ; De Cani JS
    Stat Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):1439-45. PubMed ID: 2281231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
    Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CP function: an alpha spending function based on conditional power.
    Jiang Z; Wang L; Li C; Xia J; Wang W
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(26):4501-14. PubMed ID: 25100033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible implementations of group sequential stopping rules using constrained boundaries.
    Burington BE; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 14969454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible stopping boundaries when changing primary endpoints after unblinded interim analyses.
    Chen LM; Ibrahim JG; Chu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):817-33. PubMed ID: 24697500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A gatekeeping procedure to test a primary and a secondary endpoint in a group sequential design with multiple interim looks.
    Tamhane AC; Gou J; Jennison C; Mehta CR; Curto T
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28589692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upstrapping to determine futility: predicting future outcomes nonparametrically from past data.
    Wild JL; Ginde AA; Lindsell CJ; Kaizer AM
    Trials; 2024 May; 25(1):312. PubMed ID: 38725072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.
    Anderson KM
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 17623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.
    Li X; Herrmann C; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):274. PubMed ID: 33153438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of methods for futility stopping based on conditional power.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2747-64. PubMed ID: 16134130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs.
    Stallard N; Todd S; Ryan EG; Gates S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31910813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computations for group sequential boundaries using the Lan-DeMets spending function method.
    Reboussin DM; DeMets DL; Kim KM; Lan KK
    Control Clin Trials; 2000 Jun; 21(3):190-207. PubMed ID: 10822118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian sequential design using alpha spending function to control type I error.
    Zhu H; Yu Q
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2184-2196. PubMed ID: 26187736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing a primary and a secondary endpoint in a group sequential design.
    Tamhane AC; Mehta CR; Liu L
    Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1174-84. PubMed ID: 20337631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.