272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31340226)
1. Apically Extruded Debris Using Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Associated with Different Root Canal Irrigants.
Arruda-Vasconcelos R; Barbosa-Ribeiro M; Louzada LM; Mantovani GD; Gomes BP
Braz Dent J; 2019 Jul; 30(4):363-367. PubMed ID: 31340226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Positive and Negative Pressure Irrigation Systems in Association with Different Irrigants.
Barbosa-Ribeiro M; Arruda-Vasconcelos R; Fabretti FL; Silva EJNL; De-Deus G; Gomes BPFA
Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29898066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite activated with two laser systems and ultrasonics: a spectrophotometric analysis.
Helvacıoğlu Kıvanç B; Deniz Arısu H; Yanar NÖ; Silah HM; İnam R; Görgül G
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():71. PubMed ID: 26112918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Preparation Using Three Different File Systems Applied Under 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% CHX Irrigation.
Zarean P; Özcan M; Molaie M; Mortaheb A; Al-Haj Husain N; Molaeinasab H; Zare Jahromi M; Zarean P
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2023 Nov; 31(4):391-397. PubMed ID: 37265244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of apical debris extrusion using EDDY, passive ultrasonic activation and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming irrigation activation devices.
İnce Yusufoglu S; Keskin NB; Saricam E; Bozkurt DA
Aust Endod J; 2020 Dec; 46(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 32881182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can kinematics, file diameter, and PUI influence the intracanal decontamination and apical bacterial extrusion?
Cuellar MRC; Velásquez-Espedilla EG; Pedrinha VF; Vivan RR; Duarte MAH; Andrade FB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 35():e003. PubMed ID: 33206776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting file system, Vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris.
Karatas E; Ozsu D; Arslan H; Erdogan AS
Int Endod J; 2015 Apr; 48(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of different irrigation methods in the presence of a separated instrument: an
Uzunoglu-Özyürek E; Dik Güzel C; Dogan Buzoglu H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2020 Aug; 78(6):409-416. PubMed ID: 32105162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.
Urban K; Donnermeyer D; Schäfer E; Bürklein S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2681-2687. PubMed ID: 28185091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of irrigant penetration up to working length and into simulated lateral canals using various irrigating techniques.
Spoorthy E; Velmurugan N; Ballal S; Nandini S
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):815-22. PubMed ID: 23550538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectrophotometric determination of irrigant extrusion using passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator, or syringe irrigation.
Rodríguez-Figueroa C; McClanahan SB; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1622-6. PubMed ID: 25260734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris: an in vitro study].
Zhang L; Zhu LL; Zhang ML
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2014 Dec; 23(6):695-8. PubMed ID: 25636284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on Enterococcus faecalis from Root Canals: An Ex Vivo Study.
Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Chávez-Andrade GM; de Faria-Júnior NB; Watanabe E; Tanomaru-Filho M
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 26312969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Did in-between rinsing and agitating with distilled water prevents precipitate formation by the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine canal irrigants?
Maiola EC; Boppré LM; Savaris JM; Dias Junior LCL; Garcia LDFR; Teixeira CDS; Bortoluzzi EA
Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Feb; 87(2):315-325. PubMed ID: 37811954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.
Mancini M; Cerroni L; Iorio L; Armellin E; Conte G; Cianconi L
J Endod; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1456-60. PubMed ID: 24139274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament by different irrigants and irrigating techniques: a cone beam computed tomography analysis.
Neelakantan P; Sriraman P; Gutmann JL
Gen Dent; 2017; 65(6):45-49. PubMed ID: 29099365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Debris extrusion during root canal preparation with nickel-titanium instruments using liquid and gel formulations of sodium hypochlorite in vitro.
Ozlek E; Neelakantan P; Khan K; Cheung GSP; Rossi-Fedele G
Aust Endod J; 2021 Aug; 47(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 32748569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
