These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31340384)

  • 1. [The influence of the daily-life relevance of APHAB-questions on answering the APHAB-questions itself].
    Storz S; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R; Löhler J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2019 Sep; 98(9):617-624. PubMed ID: 31340384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Everyday relevance of APHAB questions : Influence on answer frequency].
    Storz S; Schönweiler R; Wollenberg B; Löhler J
    HNO; 2019 Nov; 67(11):825-835. PubMed ID: 31143975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Distribution and Scattering of APHAB Answers Before and After Hearing Aid Fitting].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Nov; 95(11):768-773. PubMed ID: 26743978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Wollenberg B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3587-3593. PubMed ID: 26975446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].
    Löhler J; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2017 Nov; 65(11):901-909. PubMed ID: 28455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].
    Löhler J; Moser L; Heinrich D; Hörmann K; Walther LE
    HNO; 2012 Jul; 60(7):626-36. PubMed ID: 22763767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Brännström KJ; Andersson K; Sandgren O; Whitling S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Oct; 31(9):656-665. PubMed ID: 33296928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).
    Löhler J; Gräbner F; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3593-3598. PubMed ID: 28756570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].
    Löhler J; Sippel M; Walther LE; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Apr; 101(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 34157776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Sep; 14(7):361-71. PubMed ID: 14620610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dependency of APHAB score in the EC
    Löhler J; Wegner O; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(7):550-558. PubMed ID: 29532108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Development and use of an APHAB database].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Schlattmann P; Wollenberg B; Schönweiler R
    HNO; 2014 Oct; 62(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 25231698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Nabelek AK; Tampas JW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 18230861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].
    Löhler J; Akcicek B; Kappe T; Wollenberg B; Schlattmann P; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Aug; 95(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 27064271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The use of the German APHAB for quality control in hearing aid fitting in an ENT-office. Comparison of our results with the given US-norm].
    Löhler J; Frohburg R; Moser L
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Dec; 89(12):737-44. PubMed ID: 20706977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of different measurements of the benefit in hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].
    Thomas M; Schönweiler R; Löhler J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2020 Aug; 99(8):536-544. PubMed ID: 32289836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the impact of hearing loss in adults: Validation of a quality of life questionnaire.
    Ambert-Dahan E; Laouénan C; Lebredonchel M; Borel S; Carillo C; Bouccara D; Sterkers O; Ferrary E; Mosnier I
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2018 Feb; 135(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 29274768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Possibilities to predict the success of an individual hearing aid fitting using the APHAB].
    Thomas M; Schönweiler R; Löhler J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Mar; 101(3):206-215. PubMed ID: 33429443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.