161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31340802)
1. Improving ultrasound-based prostate volume estimation.
Aprikian S; Luz M; Brimo F; Scarlata E; Hamel L; Cury FL; Tanguay S; Aprikian AG; Kassouf W; Chevalier S
BMC Urol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 31340802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy.
MacMahon PJ; Kennedy AM; Murphy DT; Maher M; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate?
Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA
Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS.
Kälkner KM; Kubicek G; Nilsson J; Lundell M; Levitt S; Nilsson S
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17069912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of in vivo calculation with ultrasonography compared to physical sections in vitro: a stereological study of prostate volumes.
Acer N; Sofikerim M; Ertekin T; Unur E; Çay M; Öztürk F
Anat Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 86(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 20734181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of testicular volume in smaller testes: how accurate is the conventional orchidometer?
Lin CC; Huang WJ; Chen KK
J Androl; 2009; 30(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 19578133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.
Paterson NR; Lavallée LT; Nguyen LN; Witiuk K; Ross J; Mallick R; Shabana W; MacDonald B; Scheida N; Fergusson D; Momoli F; Cnossen S; Morash C; Cagiannos I; Breau RH
Can Urol Assoc J; 2016 Aug; 10(7-8):264-268. PubMed ID: 27878049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The weight of the prostate gland is an excellent surrogate for gland volume.
Varma M; Morgan JM
Histopathology; 2010 Jul; 57(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 20653780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of prostatic volume and dimensions by transrectal and transurethral ultrasonography.
Nathan MS; Mei Q; Seenivasagam K; Davies B; Wickham JE; Miller RA
Br J Urol; 1996 Jul; 78(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 8795406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Transabdominal and Transrectal Ultrasound for Sizing of the Prostate.
Pate WR; Garg N; Wang LB; Wason SE; Barbosa PV
Urology; 2020 Jul; 141():125-129. PubMed ID: 32333985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Wolff JM; Boeckmann W; Mattelaer P; Handt S; Adam G; Jakse G
Eur Urol; 1995; 28(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8521887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
