BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31340852)

  • 1. Identification of city specific important bacterial signature for the MetaSUB CAMDA challenge microbiome data.
    Walker AR; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2019 Jul; 14(1):11. PubMed ID: 31340852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unraveling city-specific signature and identifying sample origin locations for the data from CAMDA MetaSUB challenge.
    Zhang R; Walker AR; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2021 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 33397406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.
    Ryan FJ
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 31420049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unraveling bacterial fingerprints of city subways from microbiome 16S gene profiles.
    Walker AR; Grimes TL; Datta S; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2018 May; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 29789016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
    Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
    Chen JC; Tyler AD
    Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unraveling City-Specific Microbial Signatures and Identifying Sample Origins for the Data From CAMDA 2020 Metagenomic Geolocation Challenge.
    Zhang R; Ellis D; Walker AR; Datta S
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():659650. PubMed ID: 34421984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling.
    Huang L; Xu C; Yang W; Yu R
    Biol Direct; 2020 Nov; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 33225966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
    Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
    Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fingerprinting cities: differentiating subway microbiome functionality.
    Zhu C; Miller M; Lusskin N; Mahlich Y; Wang Y; Zeng Z; Bromberg Y
    Biol Direct; 2019 Oct; 14(1):19. PubMed ID: 31666099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint.
    Kawulok J; Kawulok M; Deorowicz S
    Biol Direct; 2019 Nov; 14(1):20. PubMed ID: 31722729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of urban microbiome assemblies with the help of targeted in silico gold standards.
    Gerner SM; Rattei T; Graf AB
    Biol Direct; 2018 Oct; 13(1):22. PubMed ID: 30621760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MetaBinG2: a fast and accurate metagenomic sequence classification system for samples with many unknown organisms.
    Qiao Y; Jia B; Hu Z; Sun C; Xiang Y; Wei C
    Biol Direct; 2018 Aug; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 30134953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of REPLI-g Multiple Displacement Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Techniques for Metagenomic Applications.
    Ahsanuddin S; Afshinnekoo E; Gandara J; Hakyemezoğlu M; Bezdan D; Minot S; Greenfield N; Mason CE
    J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 28344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supervised Machine Learning Enables Geospatial Microbial Provenance.
    Bhattacharya C; Tierney BT; Ryon KA; Bhattacharyya M; Hastings JJA; Basu S; Bhattacharya B; Bagchi D; Mukherjee S; Wang L; Henaff EM; Mason CE
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 36292799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. OTUX: V-region specific OTU database for improved 16S rRNA OTU picking and efficient cross-study taxonomic comparison of microbiomes.
    Yadav D; Dutta A; Mande SS
    DNA Res; 2019 Apr; 26(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 30624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metagenomic Geolocation Prediction Using an Adaptive Ensemble Classifier.
    Anyaso-Samuel S; Sachdeva A; Guha S; Datta S
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():642282. PubMed ID: 33959149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joining Illumina paired-end reads for classifying phylogenetic marker sequences.
    Liu T; Chen CY; Chen-Deng A; Chen YL; Wang JY; Hou YI; Lin MC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):105. PubMed ID: 32171248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.