These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31340852)

  • 1. Identification of city specific important bacterial signature for the MetaSUB CAMDA challenge microbiome data.
    Walker AR; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2019 Jul; 14(1):11. PubMed ID: 31340852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unraveling city-specific signature and identifying sample origin locations for the data from CAMDA MetaSUB challenge.
    Zhang R; Walker AR; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2021 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 33397406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of machine learning techniques for creating urban microbial fingerprints.
    Ryan FJ
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):13. PubMed ID: 31420049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unraveling bacterial fingerprints of city subways from microbiome 16S gene profiles.
    Walker AR; Grimes TL; Datta S; Datta S
    Biol Direct; 2018 May; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 29789016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
    Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
    Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
    Chen JC; Tyler AD
    Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unraveling City-Specific Microbial Signatures and Identifying Sample Origins for the Data From CAMDA 2020 Metagenomic Geolocation Challenge.
    Zhang R; Ellis D; Walker AR; Datta S
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():659650. PubMed ID: 34421984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling.
    Huang L; Xu C; Yang W; Yu R
    Biol Direct; 2020 Nov; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 33225966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
    Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
    Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fingerprinting cities: differentiating subway microbiome functionality.
    Zhu C; Miller M; Lusskin N; Mahlich Y; Wang Y; Zeng Z; Bromberg Y
    Biol Direct; 2019 Oct; 14(1):19. PubMed ID: 31666099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint.
    Kawulok J; Kawulok M; Deorowicz S
    Biol Direct; 2019 Nov; 14(1):20. PubMed ID: 31722729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of urban microbiome assemblies with the help of targeted in silico gold standards.
    Gerner SM; Rattei T; Graf AB
    Biol Direct; 2018 Oct; 13(1):22. PubMed ID: 30621760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MetaBinG2: a fast and accurate metagenomic sequence classification system for samples with many unknown organisms.
    Qiao Y; Jia B; Hu Z; Sun C; Xiang Y; Wei C
    Biol Direct; 2018 Aug; 13(1):15. PubMed ID: 30134953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
    Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of REPLI-g Multiple Displacement Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Techniques for Metagenomic Applications.
    Ahsanuddin S; Afshinnekoo E; Gandara J; Hakyemezoğlu M; Bezdan D; Minot S; Greenfield N; Mason CE
    J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 28344519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. OTUX: V-region specific OTU database for improved 16S rRNA OTU picking and efficient cross-study taxonomic comparison of microbiomes.
    Yadav D; Dutta A; Mande SS
    DNA Res; 2019 Apr; 26(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 30624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supervised Machine Learning Enables Geospatial Microbial Provenance.
    Bhattacharya C; Tierney BT; Ryon KA; Bhattacharyya M; Hastings JJA; Basu S; Bhattacharya B; Bagchi D; Mukherjee S; Wang L; Henaff EM; Mason CE
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 36292799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metagenomic Geolocation Prediction Using an Adaptive Ensemble Classifier.
    Anyaso-Samuel S; Sachdeva A; Guha S; Datta S
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():642282. PubMed ID: 33959149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joining Illumina paired-end reads for classifying phylogenetic marker sequences.
    Liu T; Chen CY; Chen-Deng A; Chen YL; Wang JY; Hou YI; Lin MC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):105. PubMed ID: 32171248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.