These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31341012)
41. Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications. Romanis EC J Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 44(11):751-755. PubMed ID: 30097459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus. Räsänen J Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 29044695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Parental responsibilities and moral status. Blackshaw BP; Rodger D J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32253364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ectogenesis rescue case: a reply to Hendricks. Simkulet W J Med Ethics; 2024 Aug; 50(9):650-652. PubMed ID: 37734907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The (Un)Ethical Womb: The Promises and Perils of Artificial Gestation. Ferreira A J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Sep; 19(3):381-394. PubMed ID: 35403963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Abortion, infanticide and moral context. Porter L J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Procreation machines: Ectogenesis as reproductive enhancement, proper medicine or a step towards posthumanism? Eichinger J; Eichinger T Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):385-391. PubMed ID: 31943287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bioethics and Biopolitics: Presents and Futures of Reproduction. Camporesi S J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 28608054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Formula feeding can help illuminate long-term consequences of full ectogenesis. Buturovic Z Bioethics; 2020 May; 34(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 31664718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Could artificial wombs end the abortion debate? Kaczor C Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(2):283-301. PubMed ID: 16170885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants. Strong C J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):457-78. PubMed ID: 9360198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Beyond a Medicalized View of Reproduction: Recentering Pregnant People in the Ethics of Ectogenesis. Roesner N Am J Bioeth; 2023 May; 23(5):102-104. PubMed ID: 37130421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The ethics of ex utero research on spare 'non-viable' IVF human embryos. Baylis FE Bioethics; 1990 Oct; 4(4):311-29. PubMed ID: 11649274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Gestaticide: killing the subject of the artificial womb. Rodger D; Colgrove N; Blackshaw BP J Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 33127667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Why bother the public? A critique of Leslie Cannold's empirical research on ectogenesis. Smajdor A Theor Med Bioeth; 2021 Aug; 42(3-4):155-168. PubMed ID: 34846609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs. Horn C J Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 46(11):787-788. PubMed ID: 32366699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Would artificial wombs produce more harm than good? Davin J; Kaczor C Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(4):657; author reply 658. PubMed ID: 16459368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth. Adkins V J Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 32647041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Having a life versus being alive. Kushner T J Med Ethics; 1984 Mar; 10(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 6708064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The moral imperative for ectogenesis. Smajdor A Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 17695628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]