These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31341012)
61. Why not artificial wombs? Rosen C New Atlantis; 2003; 3():67-76. PubMed ID: 15586953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas. McLachlan HV J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):550-1. PubMed ID: 27125988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Personhood and human embryos and fetuses. Tauer CA J Med Philos; 1985 Aug; 10(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 4045333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Ethics Considerations Regarding Artificial Womb Technology for the Fetonate. De Bie FR; Kim SD; Bose SK; Nathanson P; Partridge EA; Flake AW; Feudtner C Am J Bioeth; 2023 May; 23(5):67-78. PubMed ID: 35362359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Abortion and neonaticide: ethics, practice, and policy in four nations. Gross ML Bioethics; 2002 Jun; 16(3):202-30. PubMed ID: 12211246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'. Rini RA J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion. Callahan JC J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 8605389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Ethics and ectogenesis. Johnstone MJ Aust Nurs J; 2010 Jun; 17(11):33. PubMed ID: 20614662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Ectogenesis and gender-based oppression: Resisting the ideal of assimilation. Cavaliere G Bioethics; 2020 Sep; 34(7):727-734. PubMed ID: 32696504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Killing fetuses and killing newborns. Di Nucci E J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Could We Be Marsupials? Very Premature Babies and Artificial Wombs. Davis DS Hastings Cent Rep; 2019 Jan; 49(1):3. PubMed ID: 30790307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy? Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 163(5 Pt 1):1425-9. PubMed ID: 2240082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Reproduction and the test tube baby. Pakalnis L; Makoroto J Can Nurse; 1977 Feb; 73(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 264800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The artificial womb. Bulletti C; Palagiano A; Pace C; Cerni A; Borini A; de Ziegler D Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Mar; 1221():124-8. PubMed ID: 21401640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The Moral Status of the Human Embryo. Brown MT J Med Philos; 2018 Mar; 43(2):132-158. PubMed ID: 29546412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The Polkinghorne Report on Fetal Research: nice recommendations, shame about the reasoning. Keown J J Med Ethics; 1993 Jun; 19(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 8331636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The unborn. Human values and responsibilities. Tiefel HO JAMA; 1978 May; 239(21):2263-7. PubMed ID: 650806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong? Agar N J Med Ethics; 2013 Feb; 39(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 22923439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The Moral Status of Cognitively Enhanced Monkeys and Other Novel Beings. Arnason G Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 34109929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Commentary on 'Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective'. Cohen IG J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 32015016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]