These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31341012)
81. Unique benefits of ectogenesis outweigh potential harms. Kendal E Emerg Top Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 3(6):719-722. PubMed ID: 32915221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. There is no right to the death of the fetus. Hendricks P Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):395-397. PubMed ID: 29883519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs) - all the way to the artificial womb? Simonstein F Med Health Care Philos; 2006; 9(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 16988897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. The moral status of beings who are not persons: a casuistic argument. Wetlesen J Environ Values; 1999 Aug; 8(3):287-323. PubMed ID: 15586461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The 'fetus as a patient' in maternal-fetal surgery. Rodrigues HC; van den Berg PP; Düwell M J Med Ethics; 2013 Apr; 39(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 23349508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss. Ord T Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):12-9. PubMed ID: 18759175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Orphans and the relational significance of birth: a response to Singh. Bobier CA J Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 32913114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus? Mathison E; Davis J Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):313-320. PubMed ID: 28182294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. In defense of ectogenesis. Smajdor A Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 22152461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. The moral status of babies. McGee A J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. The physician's moral obligations to the pregnant woman, the fetus, and the child. Fleischman AR; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB Semin Perinatol; 1998 Jun; 22(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 9650225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Preimplantational ectogenesis. Science and speculation concerning in vitro fertilization and related procedures. Karp LE; Donahue RP West J Med; 1976 Apr; 124(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 1266215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Additional protections pertaining to research, development and related activities involving fetuses, pregnant women and in vitro fertilization. Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(7):1757-9. PubMed ID: 10306151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. Divisibility and the moral status of embryos. Munthe C Bioethics; 2001 Oct; 15(5-6):382-97. PubMed ID: 12058765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Risk and mid-level moral principles. Espinoza N; Peterson M Bioethics; 2012 Jan; 26(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 20345405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Radical enhancement as a moral status de-enhancer. Gray J Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):146-165. PubMed ID: 32734336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Interests. Kuhse H J Med Ethics; 1985 Sep; 11(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 4057220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. An ironic reductio for a 'pro-life' argument: Hurlbut's proposal for stem cell research. Elliott K Bioethics; 2007 Feb; 21(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 17845494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. A future like ours revisited. Brown MT J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):192-5; discussion 202. PubMed ID: 12042408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]