These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31341249)

  • 1. Power law relations in earthquakes from microscopic to macroscopic scales.
    Meng F; Wong LNY; Zhou H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10705. PubMed ID: 31341249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.
    Schorlemmer D; Wiemer S; Wyss M
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7058):539-42. PubMed ID: 16177788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transition regimes for growing crack populations.
    Spyropoulos C; Scholz CH; Shaw BE
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 May; 65(5 Pt 2):056105. PubMed ID: 12059645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reports on progress in physics the complex dynamics of earthquake fault systems: new approaches to forecasting and nowcasting of earthquakes.
    Rundle JB; Stein S; Donnellan A; Turcotte DL; Klein W; Saylor C
    Rep Prog Phys; 2021 May; 84(7):. PubMed ID: 33857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046123. PubMed ID: 15600476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Friction falls towards zero in quartz rock as slip velocity approaches seismic rates.
    Di Toro G; Goldsby DL; Tullis TE
    Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):436-9. PubMed ID: 14749829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling fast and slow earthquakes at various scales.
    Ide S
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2014; 90(8):259-77. PubMed ID: 25311138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength dependency of frequency-magnitude distribution in earthquakes and implications for stress state criticality.
    Matsumoto S; Iio Y; Sakai S; Kato A
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jun; 15(1):4957. PubMed ID: 38862498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are maximum magnitudes of induced earthquakes controlled by pressure diffusion?
    Langenbruch C; Moein MJA; Shapiro SA
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Aug; 382(2276):20230184. PubMed ID: 38945164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. G: Fracture energy, friction and dissipation in earthquakes.
    Nielsen S; Spagnuolo E; Violay M; Smith S; Di Toro G; Bistacchi A
    J Seismol; 2016; 20(4):1187-1205. PubMed ID: 28190968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes.
    Mulargia F; Bizzarri A
    Sci Rep; 2014 Aug; 4():6100. PubMed ID: 25156190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flash heating leads to low frictional strength of crustal rocks at earthquake slip rates.
    Goldsby DL; Tullis TE
    Science; 2011 Oct; 334(6053):216-8. PubMed ID: 21998385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid acceleration leads to rapid weakening in earthquake-like laboratory experiments.
    Chang JC; Lockner DA; Reches Z
    Science; 2012 Oct; 338(6103):101-5. PubMed ID: 23042892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the b, p values, and the fractal dimension of aftershocks sequences following two major earthquakes in central Himalaya.
    Tiwari RK; Paudyal H
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24476. PubMed ID: 38298645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalized statistical mechanics approaches to earthquakes and tectonics.
    Vallianatos F; Papadakis G; Michas G
    Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Dec; 472(2196):20160497. PubMed ID: 28119548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes.
    DeVries PMR; Viégas F; Wattenberg M; Meade BJ
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7720):632-634. PubMed ID: 30158606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Earthquake correlations and networks: a comparative study.
    Krishna Mohan TR; Revathi PG
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Apr; 83(4 Pt 2):046109. PubMed ID: 21599242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Illuminating the physics of dynamic friction through laboratory earthquakes on thrust faults.
    Tal Y; Rubino V; Rosakis AJ; Lapusta N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(35):21095-21100. PubMed ID: 32817539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting long-lasting transients of earthquake activity on a fault system by monitoring apparent stress, ground motion and clustering.
    Picozzi M; Bindi D; Zollo A; Festa G; Spallarossa D
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16268. PubMed ID: 31700092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.