These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3134215)

  • 1. Cobas-IDA system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae within four hours.
    Isenrich H; Wüst J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 7(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 3134215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Holmes B
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):1027-30. PubMed ID: 2663910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria.
    Monnet D; Lafay D; Desmonceaux M; Boeufgras JM; Allard F; Freney J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 May; 13(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 8070459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cobas-Bact system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in 4 h 20 min.
    Wenger A; Tissières LJ; Praplan FR; Kamm WR; Bille J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 25(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 3540000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Information on the automated COBAS-Bact system].
    Antal M; Seckárová A; Krcméry V; Králíková K
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1986 Sep; 35(5):316-9. PubMed ID: 2944635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.
    Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a small "conventional" identification system for fermentative gramnegative rods using a computerized data base.
    Siegrist HH; Altwegg M; Wenger A; Isenrich H; von Graevenitz A
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Oct; 266(3-4):370-8. PubMed ID: 3326369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour ATB 32E method for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freney J; Herve C; Desmonceaux M; Allard F; Boeufgras JM; Monget D; Fleurette J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jan; 29(1):138-41. PubMed ID: 1993747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [TTE-RAS (Titertek-Enterobac-Ras), a new micromethod for the semi-automatic identification of Enterobacteriaceae within 5 hours].
    Barth JG; Lett MC; Poindron P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1987; 45(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 3314607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Minitek system.
    Holmes B; Humphry PS
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1988 Feb; 64(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3286596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the Replireader in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from urine and in the recording of sensitivity tests performed by an agar dilution method.
    Waterworth PM
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 33(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 6995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new commercial system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative bacteria.
    Geiss HK; Geiss M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Jul; 11(7):610-6. PubMed ID: 1396768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four hour identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the API Rapid 20E and Micro-ID systems.
    Holmes B; Humphry PS
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1132-8. PubMed ID: 3902898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the ATB 32 E system for automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Roger F; Roger A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1992 Jan; 40(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 1570187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four-hour presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.
    Smith EG; Pritchard JK; McCarthy LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jan; 75(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 7006379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of the API 20E system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae (six hours) (author's transl)].
    Pinon G; Loulergue J; Quentin R; Darchis JP; Prieur D; Vargues R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1979; 37(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 525850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.