128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342368)
1. Improving Wait Times and Patient Experience Through Implementation of a Provincial Expedited Diagnostic Pathway for BI-RADS 5 Breast Lesions.
Laws A; Crocker A; Dort J; Olson D; Elwi A; Anderes S; Parker S; Estey A; Keehn A; Quan ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3361-3367. PubMed ID: 31342368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving breast diagnostic services with a Rapid Access Diagnostic and Support (RADS) program.
Arnaout A; Smylie J; Seely J; Robertson S; Knight K; Shin S; Ramsey T; Mallick R; Watters J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3335-40. PubMed ID: 23975290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decreasing the Interval Wait Times for Screening Mammogram Results Using the "Reflex Testing" Algorithm.
Alvarenga J; Moran J; Bulgaru A; Moran MS
J Breast Imaging; 2022 Oct; 4(5):474-479. PubMed ID: 38416949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Cross-Sectional Observational Study to Compare the Role of Ultrasound with Mammography in Women Identified at High Risk for Breast Cancer in a Population in China.
An P; Zhong S; Zhang R; Hou X; Xi R; Wang Y
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jun; 26():e919777. PubMed ID: 32576809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating wait times from screening to breast cancer diagnosis among women undergoing organised assessment vs usual care.
Chiarelli AM; Muradali D; Blackmore KM; Smith CR; Mirea L; Majpruz V; O'Malley FP; Quan ML; Holloway CM
Br J Cancer; 2017 May; 116(10):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 28359079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient navigation to improve follow-up of abnormal mammograms among disadvantaged women.
Percac-Lima S; Ashburner JM; McCarthy AM; Piawah S; Atlas SJ
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2015 Feb; 24(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 25522246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Racial Disparities in Breast Imaging Wait Times Before and After the Implementation of a Same-Day Biopsy Program.
Yoon SC; Taylor-Cho MW; Charles MG; Grimm L
J Breast Imaging; 2023 Mar; 5(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 38416937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban population.
Palmieri FM; DePeri ER; Mincey BA; Smith JA; Wen LK; Chewar DM; Abaya R; Colon-Otero G; Perez EA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2009 Apr; 84(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 19339648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small breast lesions.
Du YR; Wu Y; Chen M; Gu XG
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 29710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication.
Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micronucleus Test for Diagnosing Uncertain Cases (BI-RADS 3) in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review and Preliminary Results.
Menicagli R; Marotta O; Serra R
Gulf J Oncolog; 2020 Jan; 1(32):45-50. PubMed ID: 32342918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided?
Guo Y; Raghu M; Durand M; Hooley R
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
