140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342469)
1. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):761-772. PubMed ID: 31342469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests.
Tu N; Joo S; Lee P; Stark S
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2764-2786. PubMed ID: 35931936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.
Wetzel E; Frick S
Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jan; 46(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 34898744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching.
Lin Y; Brown A; Williams P
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):322-350. PubMed ID: 36866068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.
Kreitchmann RS; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):294-321. PubMed ID: 36866066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 29881079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does multidimensional forced-choice prevent faking? Comparing the susceptibility of the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format to faking.
Wetzel E; Frick S; Brown A
Psychol Assess; 2021 Feb; 33(2):156-170. PubMed ID: 33151727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
Luo H; Wang D; Guo Z; Cai Y; Tu D
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):288-302. PubMed ID: 35601262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linking Methods for Multidimensional Forced Choice Tests Using the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model.
Tu N; Kumar LS; Joo S; Stark S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 May; 48(3):104-124. PubMed ID: 38585303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 23148475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement Efficiency for Fixed-Precision Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests: Comparing Health Measurement and Educational Testing Using Example Banks.
Paap MCS; Born S; Braeken J
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):68-83. PubMed ID: 30573935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
