These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342757)
1. Breast compression parameters among women screened with standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in a randomized controlled trial. Waade GG; Holen Å; Sebuødegård S; Aase H; Pedersen K; Hanestad B; Hofvind S Acta Radiol; 2020 Mar; 61(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 31342757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial. Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C; Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations. Friedewald SM Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variable Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Digital Mammography, Synthesized Mammography, and Tomosynthesis: A Pictorial Essay. Hwang E; Szabo J; Sonnenblick EB; Margolies LR Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 28947267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging. Freer PE; Winkler N Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Tomosynthesis: Clinical Evidence. Poplack S Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):475-492. PubMed ID: 28411674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know? Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging. Pisano ED; Parham CA Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):861-9, x. PubMed ID: 10943283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories. Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer? Nees AV Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Johnson MM Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of age and breast thickness on mean glandular dose of standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Norsuddin NM; Mei Sin JG; Ravintaran R; Arasaratnam S; Abdul Karim MK Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Feb; 192():110525. PubMed ID: 36436228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]