344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342804)
1. Focused Submission of Tissue for Radical Prostatectomy Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Targeted Biopsy.
Fasciano D; Eich ML; Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena M; Rais-Bahrami S; Gordetsky J
Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 31342804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer.
Rayn KN; Bloom JB; Gold SA; Hale GR; Baiocco JA; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Sabarwal VK; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 29852182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiparametric ultrasound-targeted biopsy compares favorably to multiparametric MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy on initial biopsy of men at risk for prostate cancer.
Fulgham PF
World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):713-718. PubMed ID: 29368230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biopsy-Integrated 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Prostate Cancer and Its Application for Gleason Grade and Tumor Laterality Assessment.
Kim J; Lim B; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Go H; Cho YM; Park KJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Feb; 147(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 35512234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?
Deniffel D; Salinas E; Ientilucci M; Evans AJ; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Hamilton R; Roberts A; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA; Perlis N
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy.
Nyarangi-Dix J; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Hitthaler B; Schütz V; Dieffenbacher S; Mueller-Wolf M; Roth W; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Roethke M; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Nov; 6(6):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 30477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lowering positive margin rates at radical prostatectomy by color coding of biopsy specimens to permit individualized preservation of the neurovascular bundles: is it feasible? a pilot investigation.
Deane LA; Tan WP; Strong A; Lowe M; Antoine N; Ghai R; Ekbal S
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1081-1088. PubMed ID: 30044594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Focal Therapy Eligibility Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Nassiri N; Chang E; Lieu P; Priester AM; Margolis DJA; Huang J; Reiter RE; Dorey FJ; Marks LS; Natarajan S
J Urol; 2018 Feb; 199(2):453-458. PubMed ID: 28830754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?
Calio BP; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Maruf M; Jain AL; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):976-982. PubMed ID: 29154904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraprostatic Tumor Extension: Comparison of Preoperative Multiparametric MRI Criteria and Histopathologic Correlation after Radical Prostatectomy.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 32368959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Raman AG; Sarma KV; Raman SS; Priester AM; Mirak SA; Riskin-Jones HH; Dhinagar N; Speier W; Felker E; Sisk AE; Lu D; Kinnaird A; Reiter RE; Marks LS; Arnold CW
J Urol; 2021 Sep; 206(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 33908801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
