191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342915)
1. High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks.
Diamantides N; Dugopolski C; Blahut E; Kennedy S; Bonassar LJ
Biofabrication; 2019 Aug; 11(4):045016. PubMed ID: 31342915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlating rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks: the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH.
Diamantides N; Wang L; Pruiksma T; Siemiatkoski J; Dugopolski C; Shortkroff S; Kennedy S; Bonassar LJ
Biofabrication; 2017 Jul; 9(3):034102. PubMed ID: 28677597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting.
Kiyotake EA; Douglas AW; Thomas EE; Nimmo SL; Detamore MS
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():176-187. PubMed ID: 30669003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.
Ouyang L; Yao R; Zhao Y; Sun W
Biofabrication; 2016 Sep; 8(3):035020. PubMed ID: 27634915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.
Zhao Y; Li Y; Mao S; Sun W; Yao R
Biofabrication; 2015 Nov; 7(4):045002. PubMed ID: 26523399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting.
Jessop ZM; Al-Sabah A; Gao N; Kyle S; Thomas B; Badiei N; Hawkins K; Whitaker IS
Biofabrication; 2019 Jul; 11(4):045006. PubMed ID: 30743252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Viscoll collagen solution as a novel bioink for direct 3D bioprinting.
Osidak EO; Karalkin PA; Osidak MS; Parfenov VA; Sivogrivov DE; Pereira FDAS; Gryadunova AA; Koudan EV; Khesuani YD; Кasyanov VA; Belousov SI; Krasheninnikov SV; Grigoriev TE; Chvalun SN; Bulanova EA; Mironov VA; Domogatsky SP
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Mar; 30(3):31. PubMed ID: 30830351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gallol-derived ECM-mimetic adhesive bioinks exhibiting temporal shear-thinning and stabilization behavior.
Shin M; Galarraga JH; Kwon MY; Lee H; Burdick JA
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():165-175. PubMed ID: 30366132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability.
Lee J; Oh SJ; An SH; Kim WD; Kim SH
Biofabrication; 2020 May; 12(3):035018. PubMed ID: 32252038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reversible physical crosslinking strategy with optimal temperature for 3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacryloyl bioink.
Gu Y; Zhang L; Du X; Fan Z; Wang L; Sun W; Cheng Y; Zhu Y; Chen C
J Biomater Appl; 2018 Nov; 33(5):609-618. PubMed ID: 30360677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.
Paxton N; Smolan W; Böck T; Melchels F; Groll J; Jungst T
Biofabrication; 2017 Nov; 9(4):044107. PubMed ID: 28930091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation between rheological properties and extrusion-based printability in bioink artifact quantification.
Gillispie GJ; Copus J; Uzun-Per M; Yoo JJ; Atala A; Niazi MKK; Lee SJ
Mater Des; 2023 Sep; 233():. PubMed ID: 37854951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks.
Göhl J; Markstedt K; Mark A; Håkansson K; Gatenholm P; Edelvik F
Biofabrication; 2018 Jun; 10(3):034105. PubMed ID: 29809162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.
Gao T; Gillispie GJ; Copus JS; Pr AK; Seol YJ; Atala A; Yoo JJ; Lee SJ
Biofabrication; 2018 Jun; 10(3):034106. PubMed ID: 29923501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic-and visible light-crosslinking.
Petta D; Armiento AR; Grijpma D; Alini M; Eglin D; D'Este M
Biofabrication; 2018 Sep; 10(4):044104. PubMed ID: 30188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Cell Loading of Recombinant Spider Silk Based Bioinks on Gelation and Printability.
Lechner A; Trossmann VT; Scheibel T
Macromol Biosci; 2022 Mar; 22(3):e2100390. PubMed ID: 34882980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.
Ribeiro A; Blokzijl MM; Levato R; Visser CW; Castilho M; Hennink WE; Vermonden T; Malda J
Biofabrication; 2017 Nov; 10(1):014102. PubMed ID: 28976364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hydrogel-Colloid Composite Bioinks for Targeted Tissue-Printing.
Michel R; Auzély-Velty R
Biomacromolecules; 2020 Aug; 21(8):2949-2965. PubMed ID: 32568527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.
Gillispie GJ; Han A; Uzun-Per M; Fisher J; Mikos AG; Niazi MKK; Yoo JJ; Lee SJ; Atala A
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Dec; 26(23-24):1349-1358. PubMed ID: 32928068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation.
Kesti M; Müller M; Becher J; Schnabelrauch M; D'Este M; Eglin D; Zenobi-Wong M
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():162-72. PubMed ID: 25260606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
