159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31342955)
1. N1-P2: Neural markers of temporal expectation and response discrimination in interval timing.
Duzcu H; Özkurt TE; Mapelli I; Hohenberger A
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2019; 79(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 31342955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-initiation and temporal cueing of monaural tones reduce the auditory N1 and P2.
Sowman PF; Kuusik A; Johnson BW
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):149-57. PubMed ID: 22885999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal expectation and spectral expectation operate in distinct fashion on neuronal populations.
Hsu YF; Hämäläinen JA; Waszak F
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2548-55. PubMed ID: 24041666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory event-related responses to diphthongs in different attention conditions.
Morris DJ; Steinmetzger K; Tøndering J
Neurosci Lett; 2016 Jul; 626():158-63. PubMed ID: 27158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
Justen C; Herbert C
BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP correlates of the magnitude of pitch errors detected in the human voice.
Scheerer NE; Behich J; Liu H; Jones JA
Neuroscience; 2013 Jun; 240():176-85. PubMed ID: 23466810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain regions activated during an auditory discrimination task in insomniac postmenopausal patients before and after hormone replacement therapy: low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography applied to event-related potentials.
Anderer P; Saletu B; Saletu-Zyhlarz G; Gruber D; Metka M; Huber J; Pascual-Marqui RD
Neuropsychobiology; 2004; 49(3):134-53. PubMed ID: 15034229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. N1 and P2 of frequent and rare event-related potentials show effects and after-effects of the attended target in the oddball-paradigm.
Hirata K; Lehmann D
Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Oct; 9(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 2276947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similar sound intensity dependence of the N1 and P2 components of the auditory ERP: Averaged and single trial evidence.
Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Vieira JB; Silveira C; Chaves PL; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):499-508. PubMed ID: 26154993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory gating in adults with dyslexia: An ERP account of diminished rapid neural adaptation.
Peter B; McCollum H; Daliri A; Panagiotides H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2019 Nov; 130(11):2182-2192. PubMed ID: 31451333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Event-related potential components N1, P2 and P3 to rare and frequent stimuli in intellectually impaired neurological patients.
Hirata K; Pal I; Lehmann D
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1991; 240(4-5):240-5. PubMed ID: 1828998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of repeated testing on ERP components during auditory selective attention.
Shelley AM; Ward PB; Michie PT; Andrews S; Mitchell PF; Catts SV; McConaghy N
Psychophysiology; 1991 Sep; 28(5):496-510. PubMed ID: 1758927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention-dependent sound offset-related brain potentials.
Horváth J
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 26757414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
