These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343194)

  • 1. Recovering bifactor models: A comparison of seven methods.
    Giordano C; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):143-156. PubMed ID: 31343194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct Schmid-Leiman Transformations and Rank-Deficient Loadings Matrices.
    Waller NG
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):858-870. PubMed ID: 29204802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory Bifactor Analysis: The Schmid-Leiman Orthogonalization and Jennrich-Bentler Analytic Rotations.
    Mansolf M; Reise SP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):698-717. PubMed ID: 27612521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and omega hierarchical in multidimensional data: A comparison of various estimators.
    Cho E
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36048053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.
    Reise SP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Sep; 47(5):667-696. PubMed ID: 24049214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A General Approach for Fitting Pure Exploratory Bifactor Models.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 30160535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis with Multiple General Factors.
    Jiménez M; Abad FJ; Garcia-Garzon E; Garrido LE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(6):1072-1089. PubMed ID: 37038725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.
    Reise SP; Moore TM; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Nov; 92(6):544-59. PubMed ID: 20954056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On Omega Hierarchical Estimation: A Comparison of Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis Algorithms.
    Garcia-Garzon E; Abad FJ; Garrido LE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):101-119. PubMed ID: 32449372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misbegotten methodologies and forgotten lessons from Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine: A demonstration with competing structural models of psychopathology.
    Greene AL; Watts AL; Forbes MK; Kotov R; Krueger RF; Eaton NR
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1374-1403. PubMed ID: 34990188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.
    Eid M; Geiser C; Koch T; Heene M
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):541-562. PubMed ID: 27732052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation.
    Markon KE
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2019 May; 15():51-69. PubMed ID: 30649927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bifactor approach to subscore assessment.
    Dueber DM; Toland MD
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):222-241. PubMed ID: 34941326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Target rotation with both factor loadings and factor correlations.
    Zhang G; Hattori M; Trichtinger LA; Wang X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):390-402. PubMed ID: 30299117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations.
    Sellbom M; Tellegen A
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1428-1441. PubMed ID: 31120298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling the Structure of Acute Sport-Related Concussion Symptoms: A Bifactor Approach.
    Nelson LD; Kramer MD; Patrick CJ; McCrea MA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Sep; 24(8):793-804. PubMed ID: 30079858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four- and five-factor models of the WAIS-IV in a clinical sample: Variations in indicator configuration and factor correlational structure.
    Staffaroni AM; Eng ME; Moses JA; Zeiner HK; Wickham RE
    Psychol Assess; 2018 May; 30(5):693-706. PubMed ID: 29494190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studying developmental processes in accelerated cohort-sequential designs with discrete- and continuous-time latent change score models.
    Estrada E; Ferrer E
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):708-734. PubMed ID: 30945901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.
    Greene AL; Eaton NR; Li K; Forbes MK; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Waldman ID; Cicero DC; Conway CC; Docherty AR; Fried EI; Ivanova MY; Jonas KG; Latzman RD; Patrick CJ; Reininghaus U; Tackett JL; Wright AGC; Kotov R
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Oct; 128(7):740-764. PubMed ID: 31318246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.