These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343230)

  • 1. The role of children's metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study.
    Roebers CM; Mayer B; Steiner M; Bayard NS; van Loon MH
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Oct; 55(10):2077-2089. PubMed ID: 31343230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition.
    Koriat A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):416-28. PubMed ID: 18426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.
    Jaeger A; Queiroz MC; Selmeczy D; Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1477-1493. PubMed ID: 32105146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relations between parental metacognitive talk and children's early metacognition and memory.
    Geurten M; Léonard C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Feb; 226():105577. PubMed ID: 36335835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning.
    van Loon M; de Bruin A; Leppink J; Roebers C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jun; 158():77-94. PubMed ID: 28236719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental Improvements and Persisting Difficulties in Children's Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Skills: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Perspectives.
    Bayard NS; van Loon MH; Steiner M; Roebers CM
    Child Dev; 2021 May; 92(3):1118-1136. PubMed ID: 33529372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.
    Kelemen WL; Frost PJ; Weaver CA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 10714142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age.
    Hoffmann-Biencourt A; Lockl K; Schneider W; Ackerman R; Koriat A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):767-84. PubMed ID: 21121466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing and metacognition: retrieval practise effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text.
    Barenberg J; Dutke S
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):269-279. PubMed ID: 30074864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.
    Winsor AA; Flowe HD; Seale-Carlisle TM; Killeen IM; Hett D; Jores T; Ingham M; Lee BP; Stevens LM; Colloff MF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Nov; 150(11):2387-2407. PubMed ID: 34498905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring.
    Emanuel Robinson A; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):458-78. PubMed ID: 16887783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Another look at the contribution of motoric fluency to metacognitive monitoring.
    Dollois MA; Poore-Buchhaupt CJ; Fiacconi CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Dec; 76(4):251-269. PubMed ID: 35482620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. People hold mood-congruent beliefs about memory but do not use these beliefs when monitoring their learning.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK; Goodrich M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(4):499-519. PubMed ID: 34694826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of Children's monitoring and control when learning from texts: effects of age and test format.
    Steiner M; van Loon MH; Bayard NS; Roebers CM
    Metacogn Learn; 2020; 15(1):3-27. PubMed ID: 32226352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice latency as a cue for children's subjective confidence in the correctness of their answers.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Dev Sci; 2010 May; 13(3):441-453. PubMed ID: 20443965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency, not speed: temporal regularity as a metacognitive cue.
    Stevenson LM; Carlson RA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 29330595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.