These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343242)

  • 1. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? The role of focal attention and stimulus-response translation rules.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1415-1428. PubMed ID: 31343242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.
    Hilchey MD; Antinucci V; Lamy D; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):506-514. PubMed ID: 30796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files?
    Huffman G; Hilchey MD; Weidler BJ; Mills M; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 32077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.
    Yashar A; White AL; Fang W; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2017 Aug; 17(9):7. PubMed ID: 28800369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative and qualitative differences in the top-down guiding attributes of visual search.
    Hulleman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):942-964. PubMed ID: 32378936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention.
    Leonard CJ; Balestreri A; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25285472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience effects on attentional selection are enabled by task relevance.
    Zhang Y; Gaspelin N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Nov; 50(11):1131-1142. PubMed ID: 39311865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial negative priming: Location or response?
    Neill WT; Kleinsmith AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2411-2419. PubMed ID: 27465862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saccadic selection does not eliminate attribute amnesia.
    Born S; Puntiroli M; Jordan D; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 30883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses.
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Umiltà C; Eimer M
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 17602216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When is object-based attention not based on objects?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1062-1082. PubMed ID: 31021155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The spatial dynamics of mouse-tracking reveal that attention capture is stimulus-driven rather than contingent upon top-down goals.
    Dieciuc MA; Roque NA; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1285-1290. PubMed ID: 31259583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(25):8270-9. PubMed ID: 19553466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.
    Goldstein RR; Beck MR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1086-1102. PubMed ID: 29620379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.