These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343244)

  • 1. Motor sources of dual-task interference: Evidence for effector-based prioritization in dual-task control.
    Hoffmann MA; Pieczykolan A; Koch I; Huestegge L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1355-1374. PubMed ID: 31343244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.
    Hoffmann MA; Pieczykolan A; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3402-3414. PubMed ID: 32533527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Input Modality on Vocal Effector Prioritization in Manual-Vocal Dual Tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Westermann M; Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32520669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constraints in task-set control: modality dominance patterns among effector systems.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):633-7. PubMed ID: 23025562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cue the effects: Stimulus-action effect modality compatibility and dual-task costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):350-368. PubMed ID: 32223289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of motor representations to action verb processing.
    Andres M; Finocchiaro C; Buiatti M; Piazza M
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():174-84. PubMed ID: 25460390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practice-related optimization of dual-task performance: Efficient task instantiation during overlapping task processing.
    Schubert T; Strobach T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1884-1904. PubMed ID: 30335413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E; Remington RW
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Jun; 52(4):291-345. PubMed ID: 16581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
    Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults.
    Fuhrman SI; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Vestib Res; 2015; 25(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 26410669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the dual-task costs of walking: a StartReact study.
    Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Barthel C; Solis-Escalante T; Bloem BR; Weerdesteyn V
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 May; 238(5):1359-1364. PubMed ID: 32355996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Koch I; Huestegge L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1563-1577. PubMed ID: 35199283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talking while looking: on the encapsulation of output system representations.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Koch I
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Sep; 73():72-91. PubMed ID: 25003309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Action dual tasks reveal differential effects of visual imagery perspectives on motor performance.
    Callow N; Edwards MG; Jones AL; Hardy L; Connell S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1401-1411. PubMed ID: 30352540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action scheduling in multitasking: A multi-phase framework of response-order control.
    Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1464-1487. PubMed ID: 30645728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment.
    Palada H; Neal A; Strayer D; Ballard T; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1331-1345. PubMed ID: 31282694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the effects of a visual or auditory Stroop task on dual-task costs during obstacle crossing.
    Worden TA; Mendes M; Singh P; Vallis LA
    Gait Posture; 2016 Oct; 50():159-163. PubMed ID: 27621085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.