These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343249)

  • 1. Metacognitive myopia in change detection: A collective approach to overcome a persistent anomaly.
    Fiedler K; Schott M; Kareev Y; Avrahami J; Ackerman R; Goldsmith M; Mata A; Ferreira MB; Newell BR; Pantazi M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):649-668. PubMed ID: 31343249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.
    Mazancieux A; Fleming SM; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1788-1799. PubMed ID: 32191079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Components of metacognition can function independently across development.
    O'Leary AP; Sloutsky VM
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Feb; 55(2):315-328. PubMed ID: 30525831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.
    Carpenter J; Sherman MT; Kievit RA; Seth AK; Lau H; Fleming SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 30596440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning by heart-the relationship between resting vagal tone and metacognitive judgments: a pilot study.
    Meessen J; Sütterlin S; Gauggel S; Forkmann T
    Cogn Process; 2018 Nov; 19(4):557-561. PubMed ID: 29796847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive improvement: Disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds.
    Rouy M; de Gardelle V; Reyes G; Sackur J; Vergnaud JC; Filevich E; Faivre N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2083-2091. PubMed ID: 35157481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous versus prospective/retrospective uncertainty monitoring: The effect of response competition across cognitive levels.
    Church BA; Jackson BN; Beran MJ; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):311-321. PubMed ID: 31021131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic sources of evidence supporting confidence judgments and error detection.
    Charles L; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 30489097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of domain-general metacognitive responding in rhesus monkeys.
    Brown EK; Templer VL; Hampton RR
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():132-144. PubMed ID: 27939856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaired metacognition and reduced neural signals of decision confidence in adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Carton S; O'Keeffe F; Delargy M; Dockree PM
    Neuropsychology; 2022 Nov; 36(8):776-790. PubMed ID: 36074615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory noise increases metacognitive efficiency.
    Bang JW; Shekhar M; Rahnev D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):437-452. PubMed ID: 30382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness.
    Di Gregorio F; Maier ME; Steinhauser M
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102857. PubMed ID: 31837572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive processing in language learning tasks is affected by bilingualism.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Soto D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):529-538. PubMed ID: 31282726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing electrophysiological correlates of judgment of learning and feeling of knowing during face-name recognition.
    Irak M; Soylu C; Turan G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2019; 36(7-8):336-357. PubMed ID: 31928316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Search fluency as a misleading measure of memory.
    Stone SM; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 31886699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.