These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343249)

  • 21. Search fluency as a misleading measure of memory.
    Stone SM; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 31886699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Avoiding the conflict: Metacognitive awareness drives the selection of low-demand contexts.
    Desender K; Buc Calderon C; Van Opstal F; Van den Bussche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 28368164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.
    Wokke ME; Cleeremans A; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 28123015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speed-accuracy trade-offs in sample-based decisions.
    Fiedler K; McCaughey L; Prager J; Eichberger J; Schnell K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1203-1224. PubMed ID: 33252978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
    Riemer M; Kubik V; Wolbers T
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 369():111929. PubMed ID: 31047923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimal use of reminders: Metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading.
    Gilbert SJ; Bird A; Carpenter JM; Fleming SM; Sachdeva C; Tsai PC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 31448938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Carving Metacognition at Its Joints: Protracted Development of Component Processes.
    O'Leary AP; Sloutsky VM
    Child Dev; 2017 May; 88(3):1015-1032. PubMed ID: 27759890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does social context impact metacognition? Evidence from stereotype threat in a visual search task.
    Gajdos T; Régner I; Huguet P; Hainguerlot M; Vergnaud JC; Sackur J; de Gardelle V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215050. PubMed ID: 30986234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When reality is out of focus: Can people tell whether their beliefs and judgments are correct or wrong?
    Koriat A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):613-631. PubMed ID: 29369643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of metacognitive monitoring feedback on performance in a computer-based training simulation.
    Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():193-202. PubMed ID: 29122190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of judgments of learning - An ERP study on metacognition.
    Müller BCN; Tsalas NRH; van Schie HT; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Sodian B; Paulus M
    Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 1652():170-177. PubMed ID: 27720854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.
    Levin DT; Biswas G; Lappin JS; Rushdy M; Seiffert AE
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102781. PubMed ID: 31319238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anomalies in the detection of change: When changes in sample size are mistaken for changes in proportions.
    Fiedler K; Kareev Y; Avrahami J; Beier S; Kutzner F; Hütter M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):143-61. PubMed ID: 26179055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information.
    Salovich NA; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):608-624. PubMed ID: 33151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
    Boldt A; de Gardelle V; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1520-1531. PubMed ID: 28383959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Metacognitive monitoring and control processes in children with autism spectrum disorder: Diminished judgement of confidence accuracy.
    Grainger C; Williams DM; Lind SE
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():65-74. PubMed ID: 26985883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.