219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343821)
1. Implement a knowledge-based automated dose volume histogram prediction module in Pinnacle
Xu H; Lu J; Wang J; Fan J; Hu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):134-140. PubMed ID: 31343821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Iterative dataset optimization in automated planning: Implementation for breast and rectal cancer radiotherapy.
Fan J; Wang J; Zhang Z; Hu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2515-2531. PubMed ID: 28339103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can knowledge-based DVH predictions be used for automated, individualized quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans?
Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():234. PubMed ID: 26584574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Knowledge-based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer.
Cao W; Gronberg M; Olanrewaju A; Whitaker T; Hoffman K; Cardenas C; Garden A; Skinner H; Beadle B; Court L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 23(6):e13614. PubMed ID: 35488508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic treatment planning facilitates fast generation of high-quality treatment plans for esophageal cancer.
Hansen CR; Nielsen M; Bertelsen AS; Hazell I; Holtved E; Zukauskaite R; Bjerregaard JK; Brink C; Bernchou U
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1495-1500. PubMed ID: 28840767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hybrid automated treatment planning solution for esophageal cancer.
Ling C; Han X; Zhai P; Xu H; Chen J; Wang J; Hu W
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):232. PubMed ID: 31856866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.
Mohamed Yoosuf AB; AlShehri S; Alhadab A; Alqathami M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):80-87. PubMed ID: 31605456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auto- versus human-driven plan in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiation treatment.
Clemente S; Oliviero C; Palma G; D'Avino V; Liuzzi R; Conson M; Pacelli R; Cella L
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 13(1):202. PubMed ID: 30340604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling of multiple planning target volumes for head and neck treatments in knowledge-based treatment planning.
Zhang J; Ge Y; Sheng Y; Yin FF; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3812-3822. PubMed ID: 31236943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Knowledge-based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer.
Babier A; Boutilier JJ; McNiven AL; Chan TCY
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2875-2883. PubMed ID: 29679492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvements in treatment planning calculations motivated by tightening IMRT QA tolerances.
Stambaugh C; Gagneur J; Uejo A; Clouser E; Ezzell G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30599085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inverse optimization of objective function weights for treatment planning using clinical dose-volume histograms.
Babier A; Boutilier JJ; Sharpe MB; McNiven AL; Chan TCY
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(10):105004. PubMed ID: 29633957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Wu B; Ricchetti F; Sanguineti G; Kazhdan M; Simari P; Jacques R; Taylor R; McNutt T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(4):1241-7. PubMed ID: 20800382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.
Li N; Carmona R; Sirak I; Kasaova L; Followill D; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Mell LK; Moore KL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 27979445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology.
Liu S; Bush KK; Bertini J; Fu Y; Lewis JM; Pham DJ; Yang Y; Niedermayr TR; Skinner L; Xing L; Beadle BM; Hsu A; Kovalchuk N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):56-64. PubMed ID: 31423729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric benefits of automation in the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer: Is manual planning still an alternative option?
Li X; Wang L; Wang J; Han X; Xia B; Wu S; Hu W
Med Dosim; 2017 Winter; 42(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 28754289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating biological modeling into patient-specific plan verification.
Alexandrian AN; Mavroidis P; Narayanasamy G; McConnell KA; Kabat CN; George RB; Defoor DL; Kirby N; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 21(3):94-107. PubMed ID: 32101368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery.
Shiraishi S; Tan J; Olsen LA; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):908. PubMed ID: 25652503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
