262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31343826)
1. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced proton beam dosimetry part II: Monte Carlo
Maes D; Saini J; Zeng J; Rengan R; Wong T; Bowen SR
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 7(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 29876310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.
Botas P; Grassberger C; Sharp G; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035023. PubMed ID: 29219119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Monte Carlo and analytical dose computations for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Yepes P; Adair A; Grosshans D; Mirkovic D; Poenisch F; Titt U; Wang Q; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045003. PubMed ID: 29339570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive dosimetric study on switching from a Type-B to a Type-C dose algorithm for modern lung SBRT.
Zhou C; Bennion N; Ma R; Liang X; Wang S; Zvolanek K; Hyun M; Li X; Zhou S; Zhen W; Lin C; Wahl A; Zheng D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 May; 12(1):80. PubMed ID: 28476138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Zhuang T; Djemil T; Qi P; Magnelli A; Stephans K; Videtic G; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 14(2):4011. PubMed ID: 23470930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.
Liu W; Mohan R; Park P; Liu Z; Li H; Li X; Li Y; Wu R; Sahoo N; Dong L; Zhu XR; Grosshans DR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 25407859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pareto front analysis of 6 and 15 MV dynamic IMRT for lung cancer using pencil beam, AAA and Monte Carlo.
Ottosson RO; Karlsson A; Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4521-33. PubMed ID: 20668346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the Dosimetric Index from IMRT and Rapid arc Plan for Oropharyngeal Cancer with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Technique in Combination with EUD-based NTCP and TCP Radiobiological Models.
Dashnamoorthy S; Jeyasingh E; Rajamanickam K; Ahmed I
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 38809623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated proton therapy further reduces normal tissue exposure during definitive therapy for locally advanced distal esophageal tumors: a dosimetric study.
Welsh J; Gomez D; Palmer MB; Riley BA; Mayankkumar AV; Komaki R; Dong L; Zhu XR; Likhacheva A; Liao Z; Hofstetter WL; Ajani JA; Cox JD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1336-42. PubMed ID: 21470796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
