147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31344017)
1. Fracture of Zirconia Abutments in Implant Treatments: A Systematic Review.
Gou M; Chen H; Fu M; Wang H
Implant Dent; 2019 Aug; 28(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31344017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments.
AlAmar M; Alqahtani F
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Apr; 46(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 31909678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging.
Alsahhaf A; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():224-232. PubMed ID: 27915156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant deformation and implant-abutment fracture resistance after standardized artificial aging: An in vitro study.
Zhai Z; Nakano T; Chen Y; Watanabe S; Matsuoka T; Ishigaki S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 36415012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load to failure of different zirconia abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25976709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Thulasidas S; Givan DA; Lemons JE; O'Neal SJ; Ramp LC; Liu PR
J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 24975560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.
Pjetursson BE; Zarauz C; Strasding M; Sailer I; Zwahlen M; Zembic A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():160-183. PubMed ID: 30306682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments with Different Diameters.
Shabanpour R; Mousavi N; Ghodsi S; Alikhasi M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Aug; 16(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 26423495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts.
Chun HJ; Yeo IS; Lee JH; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Han JS; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 25830395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application.
Preis V; Kammermeier A; Handel G; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2016 Jun; 32(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 27068740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
