335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31346784)
1. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of bulk-fill resin composites using microcomputed tomography.
Ersen KA; Gürbüz Ö; Özcan M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1687-1693. PubMed ID: 31346784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Volumetric Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Composites in Class II Cavities.
Algamaiah H; Sampaio CS; Rigo LC; Janal MN; Giannini M; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Reis AF; Hirata R
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 27925387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis.
Sampaio CS; Fernández Arias J; Atria PJ; Cáceres E; Pardo Díaz C; Freitas AZ; Hirata R
Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 31500903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage of Class I Flowable Resin Composite Restorations.
Sampaio CS; Chiu KJ; Farrokhmanesh E; Janal M; Puppin-Rontani RM; Giannini M; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Hirata R
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):E16-E23. PubMed ID: 27689769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of application method on shrinkage vectors and volumetric shrinkage of bulk-fill composites in class-II restorations.
Kaisarly D; Langenegger R; Litzenburger F; Heck K; El Gezawi M; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Dent Mater; 2022 Jan; 38(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 34836696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites.
Kim RJ; Kim YJ; Choi NS; Lee IB
J Dent; 2015 Apr; 43(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 25676178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time in-depth imaging of gap formation in bulk-fill resin composites.
Hayashi J; Espigares J; Takagaki T; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Numata T; Chan D; Sadr A
Dent Mater; 2019 Apr; 35(4):585-596. PubMed ID: 30819550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites.
Rizzante FAP; Duque JA; Duarte MAH; Mondelli RFL; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
Dent Mater J; 2019 Jun; 38(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 30918231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shrinkage vectors in flowable bulk-fill and conventional composites: bulk versus incremental application.
Kaisarly D; El Gezawi M; Keßler A; Rösch P; Kunzelmann KH
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1127-1139. PubMed ID: 32653992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shrinkage stress and elastic modulus assessment of bulk-fill composites.
Rizzante FAP; Mondelli RFL; Furuse AY; Borges AFS; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180132. PubMed ID: 30624465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage force kinetics of high- and low-viscosity dimethacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk-fill resin composites.
Tauböck TT; Jäger F; Attin T
Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29948491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography.
Hirata R; Clozza E; Giannini M; Farrokhmanesh E; Janal M; Tovar N; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 May; 103(4):798-806. PubMed ID: 25115608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
