These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31346974)

  • 1. Influence of image noise and object size on segmentation accuracy of FDG-PET imaging: a phantom experiment.
    Takahashi Y; Tsuchitani T; Kotoura N; Kitajima K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Sep; 12(3):343-350. PubMed ID: 31346974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
    Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of metabolic volume and total glycolysis among six threshold-based target segmentation algorithms.
    Nakaichi T; Yamashita S; Kawakami W; Yamamoto H; Sasaki M; Yokoyama K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Aug; 34(8):583-594. PubMed ID: 32529551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-observer and segmentation method variability of textural analysis in pre-therapeutic FDG PET/CT in head and neck cancer.
    Guezennec C; Bourhis D; Orlhac F; Robin P; Corre JB; Delcroix O; Gobel Y; Schick U; Salaün PY; Abgral R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214299. PubMed ID: 30921388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cold walls on PET image quantification and volume segmentation: a phantom study.
    Berthon B; Marshall C; Edwards A; Evans M; Spezi E
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082505. PubMed ID: 23927350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
    Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [
    Zhuang M; Karakatsanis NA; Dierckx RAJO; Zaidi H
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Apr; 21(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 29956119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
    Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
    Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
    Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
    Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tumor volume and standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG PET.
    Tylski P; Stute S; Grotus N; Doyeux K; Hapdey S; Gardin I; Vanderlinden B; Buvat I
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20080896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
    Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of target delineation by positron emission tomography-based auto-segmentation methods after deformable image registration: A phantom study.
    Katayama H; Takahashi S; Maeda Y; Kobata T; Oishi A; Sasakawa Y; Shibata T
    Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():194-201. PubMed ID: 32707483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Target volume segmentation of PET images by an iterative method based on threshold value].
    Castro P; Huerga C; Glaría LA; Plaza R; Rodado S; Marín MD; Mañas A; Serrada A; Núñez L
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(6):331-9. PubMed ID: 24703996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification of image quality and quantification in whole-body positron emission tomography with continuous bed motion.
    Yamamoto H; Takemoto S; Maebatake A; Karube S; Yamashiro Y; Nakanishi A; Murakami K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Apr; 33(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 30707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
    Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-reader reliability of FDG PET volumetric tumor parameters: effects of primary tumor size and segmentation methods.
    Shah B; Srivastava N; Hirsch AE; Mercier G; Subramaniam RM
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 26(9):707-14. PubMed ID: 22797818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of Radiomic Features in [
    Lu L; Lv W; Jiang J; Ma J; Feng Q; Rahmim A; Chen W
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2016 Dec; 18(6):935-945. PubMed ID: 27324369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Novel Framework for Automated Segmentation and Labeling of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Lung Tumors in [
    Soufi M; Kamali-Asl A; Geramifar P; Rahmim A
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Jun; 19(3):456-468. PubMed ID: 27770402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.