97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3134703)
1. Influence of HDR fractions and dose on the 5-year results and complications of cervix cancer.
Joslin CA; Kilara G; Khoury G
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():100-5. PubMed ID: 3134703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Five-year results and complications with HDR afterloading in cervix cancer using a linear arrangement of source.
Mizoe J; Tsujii H; Kamada T; Arimoto T; Matsuoka Y; Shirato H; Tsuji H; Irie G
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():114-8. PubMed ID: 3134705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a plate applicator in the HDR radiation of cervix cancer: 5-year results and complications.
Alth G; Koren H
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():166-72. PubMed ID: 3134714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation therapy of cervical carcinoma using either HDR or LDR afterloading: comparison of 5-year results and complications.
Cikarić S
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():119-22. PubMed ID: 3134706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of HDR afterloading with 192Ir versus conventional radium therapy in cervix cancer: 5-year results and complications.
Glaser FH
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():106-13. PubMed ID: 3134704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 5-year results with HDR afterloading in cervix cancer: dependence on fractionation and dose.
Vahrson H; Römer G
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():139-46. PubMed ID: 3393979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 5-year results of HDR afterloading in comparison with radium therapy in Sarajevo.
Djordjević J; Bilenjki D; Strinic S
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():156-9. PubMed ID: 3134711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. 5-year results and complications following high intensity afterloading technique (CTR).
Ilić S; Ristić B
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():123-6. PubMed ID: 3134707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. One year experience of high dose-rate afterloading brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Liu MT; Chung CH
Sonderb Strahlenther Onkol; 1988; 82():205-10. PubMed ID: 3134718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series.
Ferrigno R; Nishimoto IN; Novaes PE; Pellizzon AC; Maia MA; Fogarolli RC; Salvajoli JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1108-16. PubMed ID: 15990016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of two linear-quadratic model-based isoeffect fractionation schemes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang CJ; Huang EY; Sun LM; Chen HC; Fang FM; Hsu HC; Changchien CC; Leung SW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 15093915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma.
Lertsanguansinchai P; Lertbutsayanukul C; Shotelersuk K; Khorprasert C; Rojpornpradit P; Chottetanaprasith T; Srisuthep A; Suriyapee S; Jumpangern C; Tresukosol D; Charoonsantikul C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1424-31. PubMed ID: 15275728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dose versus low-dose rate brachytherapy in definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Kucera H; Pötter R; Knocke TH; Baldass M; Kucera E
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jan; 113(1-2):58-62. PubMed ID: 11233470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective study of HDR (192Ir) versus MDR (137Cs) intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Tanaka E; Oh RJ; Yamada Y; Shiomi H; Nakamura S; Shimamoto S; Teshima T; Inoue T; Inoue T
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15062145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical radiotherapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for uterine cervix cancer long-term results.
Khor TH; Tuan JK; Hee SW; Tham IW
Australas Radiol; 2007 Dec; 51(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 17958695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer.
Toita T; Moromizato H; Ogawa K; Kakinohana Y; Maehama T; Kanazawa K; Murayama S
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 15721409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-dose-rate brachytherapy in uterine cervical carcinoma.
Patel FD; Rai B; Mallick I; Sharma SC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 15850912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) experience.
Falkenberg E; Kim RY; Meleth S; De Los Santos J; Spencer S
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16563997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of correlation between rectal complications and rectal dose following high dose rate intracavitary radiotherapy in patients with uterine cervix cancer: in vivo dosimetric analysis.
Shin KH; Huh SJ; Chie EK; Choi DR; Lim DH; Kim MK; Lee KC; Kim DY; Ahn YC
Radiat Med; 1999; 17(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 10510902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Low-dose rate intracavitary afterloading radiotherapy for cancer of uterine cervix].
Zhang X; Wang Y; Wang H
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2002 May; 24(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 12515631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
