244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31347412)
1. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and conventional multiport laparoscopic (CMPL) surgery for hysterectomy: long-term outcomes of abdominal incisional scar.
Demirayak G; Özdemir İA; Comba C; Aslan Çetin B; Aydogan Mathyk B; Yıldız M; Mihmanlı V; Karaca İ; Öztürk M; Güralp O
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31347412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery.
Park SK; Olweny EO; Best SL; Tracy CR; Mir SA; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):1097-104. PubMed ID: 21856076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-institution, Prospective, Randomized Trial to Compare the Success Rates of Single-port Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Myoma or Adenomyosis.
Kim TJ; Shin SJ; Kim TH; Cho CH; Kwon SH; Seong SJ; Song T; Hur S; Kim YM; Lee SW; Kim YT; Nam EJ; Kim YB; Lee JR; Roh HJ; Chung H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 25757810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported postoperative pain, body image, and cosmetic satisfaction after transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy.
Nomura T; Takei K; Abe S; Fukuda Y; Yamanaka N; Sejiyama S; Yamasaki M; Shibuya T; Ando T; Mori KI; Sumino Y; Sato F; Mimata H
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2017 Aug; 10(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 28145058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Better Cosmesis at the Price of an Increased Incisional Hernia Rate?
Casaccia M; Papadia FS; Palombo D; Di Domenico S; Sormani MP; Batistotti P; Mascherini M; De Cian F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1163-1167. PubMed ID: 31264921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.
Haueter R; Schütz T; Raptis DA; Clavien PA; Zuber M
Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1141-1159. PubMed ID: 28569406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-Port vs Multiport Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Zhao L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 27590569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study.
Hoyuela C; Juvany M; Guillaumes S; Ardid J; Trias M; Bachero I; Martrat A
Hernia; 2019 Dec; 23(6):1205-1213. PubMed ID: 31073959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudsi OY; Castellanos A; Kaza S; McCarty J; Dickens E; Martin D; Tiesenga FM; Konstantinidis K; Hirides P; Mehendale S; Gonzalez A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3242-3250. PubMed ID: 27864724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery comparing long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome.
Raakow J; Klein D; Barutcu AG; Biebl M; Pratschke J; Raakow R
Surg Endosc; 2020 Dec; 34(12):5533-5539. PubMed ID: 31993818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Multiport Hysterectomy: Real Benefits or Diminishing Returns?
Michener CM; Lampert E; Yao M; Harnegie MP; Chalif J; Chambers LM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):698-709.e1. PubMed ID: 33346073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A different technique in gasless laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy.
Demirayak G
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jul; 37(5):622-626. PubMed ID: 28287013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect.
Golkar FC; Ross SB; Sperry S; Vice M; Luberice K; Donn N; Morton C; Hernandez JM; Rosemurgy AS
Am J Surg; 2012 Nov; 204(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 23140831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trial.
Song T; Cho J; Kim TJ; Kim IR; Hahm TS; Kim BG; Bae DS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):460-7. PubMed ID: 23541248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmesis and body image after single-port access surgery for gynaecologic disease.
Song T; Kim TJ; Cho J; Kim IR; Kang PN; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Oct; 52(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 23045987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential benefits of single-port compared to multiport laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Tran H; Turingan I; Tran K; Zajkowska M; Lam V; Hawthorne W
Hernia; 2014 Oct; 18(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 24824813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Eom JM; Ko JH; Choi JS; Hong JH; Lee JH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 23265299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
