238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31348008)
1. Mediational E-values: Approximate Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding.
Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):835-837. PubMed ID: 31348008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error.
Fulcher IR; Shi X; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):825-834. PubMed ID: 31478915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
McCandless LC; Somers JM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Ding P; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 26841057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
le Cessie S
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure.
Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Vanderweele TJ
Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 24487211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for causal mediation studies.
Qin X; Yang F
Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):1000-1013. PubMed ID: 34914470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder.
Vanderweele TJ; Vansteelandt S; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 24487213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification and robust estimation of swapped direct and indirect effects: Mediation analysis with unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding and intermediate confounding.
Tai AS; Lin SH
Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(21):4143-4158. PubMed ID: 35716042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation.
Coffman DL; Zhong W
Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):642-64. PubMed ID: 22905648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing moderated mediation in linear models requires fewer confounding assumptions than assessing mediation.
Loeys T; Talloen W; Goubert L; Moerkerke B; Vansteelandt S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):352-374. PubMed ID: 27711981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects.
VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20479643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.
Ogburn EL; VanderWeele TJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 22930481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity plots for confounder bias in the single mediator model.
Cox MG; Kisbu-Sakarya Y; Miočević M; MacKinnon DP
Eval Rev; 2013 Oct; 37(5):405-31. PubMed ID: 24681690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement error, time lag, unmeasured confounding: Considerations for longitudinal estimation of the effect of a mediator in randomised clinical trials.
Goldsmith KA; Chalder T; White PD; Sharpe M; Pickles A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1615-1633. PubMed ID: 27647810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis.
MacKinnon DP; Pirlott AG
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Feb; 19(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 25063043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the impact of non-shared unmeasured confounding on the sibling comparison analysis.
Esen BÖ; Ehrenstein V; Petersen I; Sørensen HT; Pedersen L
Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 53(1):. PubMed ID: 38110565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
