BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31348081)

  • 1. Influence of Biological Parameters Assessed in [18F]FDG PET/CT on Overall Survival in Cervical Cancer Patients.
    Cegla P; Burchardt E; Roszak A; Czepczynski R; Kubiak A; Cholewinski W
    Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Nov; 44(11):860-863. PubMed ID: 31348081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
    Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
    Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters in uterine cervical cancer determined using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
    Yoo J; Choi JY; Moon SH; Bae DS; Park SB; Choe YS; Lee KH; Kim BT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Sep; 22(7):1226-33. PubMed ID: 22810970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis are not independent prognosticators for locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
    Guler OC; Torun N; Yildirim BA; Onal C
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170552. PubMed ID: 29293366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.
    Miccò M; Vargas HA; Burger IA; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 24767630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. (
    Scher N; Castelli J; Depeursinge A; Bourhis J; Prior JO; Herrera FG; Ozsahin M
    Cancer Radiother; 2018 May; 22(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 29650390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic value of metabolic parameters determined by preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.
    Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Park JY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 28(4):e43. PubMed ID: 28541634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
    Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
    Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured Using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma.
    Chun YJ; Jeung HC; Park HS; Park JS; Rha SY; Choi HJ; Lee JH; Jeon TJ
    Yonsei Med J; 2019 Jul; 60(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 31250573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre- and per-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters to predict recurrence and survival in cervical cancer.
    Leseur J; Roman-Jimenez G; Devillers A; Ospina-Arango JD; Williaume D; Castelli J; Terve P; Lavoue V; Garin E; Lejeune F; Acosta O; De Crevoisier R
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 27569847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overall survival and short-term efficacy analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma with skeletal muscle and
    Zhang J; Niu S; Lu X; Hu R; Wu Z; Yang S; Liu H
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4809. PubMed ID: 38413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters of
    Han S; Kim H; Kim YJ; Suh CH; Woo S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 30207790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters for reflection of aggressiveness and prediction of prognosis in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Zhang L; Sun H; Du S; Xu W; Xin J; Guo Q
    Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 30204642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. JOURNAL CLUB: Value of Quantitative FDG PET/CT Volumetric Biomarkers in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Patient Survival.
    Marcus C; Wray R; Taghipour M; Marashdeh W; Ahn SJ; Mena E; Subramaniam RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Aug; 207(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 27447341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
    Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of semiquantitative metabolic parameters of the primary tumor obtained in PET/CT with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT in patients with cervical cancer.
    Cegła P; Burchardt E; Cholewiński W; Gwóźdź S; Roszak A; Kubiak A; Kaczmarek A; Czepczyński R
    Nuklearmedizin; 2020 Jun; 59(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 32097971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
    Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor total lesion glycolysis and number of positive pelvic lymph nodes on pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) predict survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    De Cuypere M; Lovinfosse P; Gennigens C; Hermesse J; Rovira R; Duch J; Goffin F; Hustinx R; Kridelka F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1705-1712. PubMed ID: 33033165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of preoperative intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity in early stage uterine cervical cancer.
    Chung HH; Kang SY; Ha S; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Cheon GJ
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e15. PubMed ID: 26768781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pretreatment quantitative
    Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.