248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31348722)
1. Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using AMSTAR and ROBIS checklists.
Jaca A; Ndze VN; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2824-2835. PubMed ID: 31348722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Alcalde-Mellado P; Maestre-López B; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies.
Pieper D; Puljak L; González-Lorenzo M; Minozzi S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():26-33. PubMed ID: 30543911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews.
Zhong D; Xiao Q; Xiao X; Li Y; Ye J; Xia L; Zhang C; Li J; Zheng H; Jin R
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.
Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS
Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two assessment tools used in overviews of systematic reviews: ROBIS versus AMSTAR-2.
Perry R; Whitmarsh A; Leach V; Davies P
Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(1):273. PubMed ID: 34696810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability.
Banzi R; Cinquini M; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Pecoraro V; Capobussi M; Minozzi S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():24-32. PubMed ID: 29526556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers.
Gates M; Gates A; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():9-15. PubMed ID: 32416337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of systematic reviews on timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention.
Matterne U; Theurich MA; Pröbstl S; Pieper D; Wang J; Xu A; Apfelbacher C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):80. PubMed ID: 37016313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological quality of systematic reviews of the local management of anogenital warts: a systematic review using AMSTAR II, ROBIS and PRISMA.
Desmoulin A; Joly E; Tran P; Derancourt C; Bertolotti A
Sex Transm Infect; 2023 Aug; 99(5):345-347. PubMed ID: 36948589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for treating functional constipation: An overview of systematic reviews.
Yao JP; Chen LP; Xiao XJ; Hou TH; Zhou SY; Xu MM; Wang K; Hou YJ; Zhang L; Li Y
J Integr Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 34838459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
