BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31349221)

  • 1. Postoperative satisfaction following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: patient expectation versus actuality.
    Yoo JS; Patel DV; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jul; 31(5):676-682. PubMed ID: 31349221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Park GJ; Vanjani NN; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Parsons AW; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e328-e335. PubMed ID: 35259504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery.
    Elsamadicy AA; Kemeny H; Adogwa O; Sankey EW; Goodwin CR; Yarbrough CK; Lad SP; Karikari IO; Gottfried ON
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29701564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e254-e265. PubMed ID: 34583000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Self-Identified Gender on Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GJ; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e616-e627. PubMed ID: 35108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Patel DS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E263-E268. PubMed ID: 31503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 30497132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Bohl DD; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29652236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion.
    Zhang H; Glassman SD; Bisson EF; Potts EA; Jazini E; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):273-277. PubMed ID: 37797842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative Low Back Pain Affects Postoperative Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.
    Hiranaka Y; Miyazaki S; Inoue S; Ryu M; Yurube T; Kakutani K; Tadokoro K
    Asian Spine J; 2023 Aug; 17(4):750-760. PubMed ID: 37408293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Gender Influence Postoperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Mar; 32(2):E107-E111. PubMed ID: 30407263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Severe Comorbidity Burden Does Not Influence Postoperative Clinical Outcomes and Trajectory for Back Pain, Leg Pain, Physical Function, or Disability in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Park GJ; Collins AP; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e157-e168. PubMed ID: 35470080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving postoperative patient reported benefits and satisfaction following spinal fusion with a single preoperative education session.
    Eastwood D; Manson N; Bigney E; Darling M; Richardson E; Paixao R; Underwood T; Ellis K; Abraham E
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):840-845. PubMed ID: 30471460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Mental Health May Not Be Predictive of Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Mayo BC; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Massel DH; Bohl DD; Singh K
    Int J Spine Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 32128299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PROMIS Physical Function for prediction of postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Patel DV; Bawa MS; Haws BE; Khechen B; Block AM; Karmarkar SS; Lamoutte EH; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(4):476-482. PubMed ID: 30717042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.