These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring. Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity. Leempoel K; Hebert T; Hadly EA Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192353. PubMed ID: 31937227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates by environmental DNA metabarcoding. Zhang S; Zhao J; Yao M J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117971. PubMed ID: 37119629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome-scale target capture of mitochondrial and nuclear environmental DNA from water samples. Jensen MR; Sigsgaard EE; Liu S; Manica A; Bach SS; Hansen MM; Møller PR; Thomsen PF Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Apr; 21(3):690-702. PubMed ID: 33179423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water. Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring biodiversity from DNA in the air. Clare EL; Economou CK; Bennett FJ; Dyer CE; Adams K; McRobie B; Drinkwater R; Littlefair JE Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):693-700.e5. PubMed ID: 34995488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. Foote AD; Thomsen PF; Sveegaard S; Wahlberg M; Kielgast J; Kyhn LA; Salling AB; Galatius A; Orlando L; Gilbert MT PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41781. PubMed ID: 22952587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clearing muddied waters: Capture of environmental DNA from turbid waters. Williams KE; Huyvaert KP; Piaggio AJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179282. PubMed ID: 28686659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing multiple substrates for terrestrial biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA metabarcoding. van der Heyde M; Bunce M; Wardell-Johnson G; Fernandes K; White NE; Nevill P Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 May; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 32065512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals. Lyet A; Pellissier L; Valentini A; Dejean T; Hehmeyer A; Naidoo R Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11362. PubMed ID: 34131168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? Nukazawa K; Akahoshi K; Suzuki Y PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230174. PubMed ID: 32163471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats. Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying error and accurately interpreting environmental DNA metabarcoding results: A case study to detect vertebrates at arid zone waterholes. Furlan EM; Davis J; Duncan RP Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 32310337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]