These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31349666)

  • 1. A Finite Element Analysis to Compare Stress Distribution on Extra-Short Implants with Two Different Internal Connections.
    García-Braz SH; Prados-Privado M; Zanatta LCS; Calvo-Guirado JL; Prados-Frutos JC; Gehrke SA
    J Clin Med; 2019 Jul; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 31349666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Varying Diameter and Connection Type in Implants with High Crown-Implant Ratio.
    Moraes SLD; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Lemos CAA; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 29267522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
    Hanaoka M; Gehrke SA; Mardegan F; Gennari CR; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Corbella S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 24750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Torcato LB; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Santiago Júnior JF; de Faria Almeida DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 26187105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.
    Prados-Privado M; Gehrke SA; Rojo R; Prados-Frutos JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 30427957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS; Benetti P; Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Linden MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress evaluation of implant-abutment connections under different loading conditions: a 3D finite element study.
    Takahashi JM; Dayrell AC; Consani RL; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 23574455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
    Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
    Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.