These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31349805)

  • 41. Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: A systematic review.
    Tran L; Tam DNH; Elshafay A; Dang T; Hirayama K; Huy NT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):101. PubMed ID: 33964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Contacting of authors modified crucial outcomes of systematic reviews but was poorly reported, not systematic, and produced conflicting results.
    Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():64-76. PubMed ID: 31295514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Tsujimoto Y; Luo Y; Yamamoto K; So R; Aga M; Matsushima K; Fukuma S; Furukawa TA
    Br J Surg; 2021 Dec; 108(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 34791075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: leads for enhancements: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Leclercq V; Beaudart C; Ajamieh S; Tirelli E; Bruyère O
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e036349. PubMed ID: 32747348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Meta-analyses using real-world data to generate clinical and epidemiological evidence: a systematic literature review of existing recommendations.
    Briere JB; Bowrin K; Taieb V; Millier A; Toumi M; Coleman C
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Dec; 34(12):2125-2130. PubMed ID: 30217138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis.
    Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Ruano J; Gomez-Garcia F; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Maestre-Lopez B; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Velez Garcia-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175419. PubMed ID: 28403245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Gray HM; Simpson A; Bowers A; Johnson AL; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():323-331. PubMed ID: 31708197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical trial registry use in minimally invasive surgical oncology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Fuller K; Bowers A; Vassar M
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Apr; 25(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 31427352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
    Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Are meta-analyses of Chinese herbal medicine trials trustworthy and clinically applicable? A cross-sectional study.
    Chung VC; Ho RS; Wu X; Fung DH; Lai X; Wu JC; Wong SY
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2015 Mar; 162():47-54. PubMed ID: 25554640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Frequent inappropriate use of unweighted summary statistics in systematic reviews of pathogen genotypes or genogroups.
    Tran L; Nhu Y M; Le Ba Nghia T; Hendam A; Vuong NL; Alzalal E; Sayed AM; Hussain MM; Sharma A; Tieu T; Mathenge PG; Hirayama K; Alexander N; Huy NT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():26-35. PubMed ID: 31740320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Training practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a cross-sectional survey of participants in the Australasian Cochrane Centre training program.
    Piehl JH; Green S; Silagy C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2002 Jun; 2(1):11. PubMed ID: 12057022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
    Tao H; Zhang Y; Li Q; Chen J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2245-2256. PubMed ID: 28875225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Best Practices for Meta-Reviews in Physical Activity and Health Research: Insights From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
    Pescatello LS; Hennessy EA; Katzmarzyk PT; Kraus WE; Fish AF; Craft LL; Johnson BT
    J Phys Act Health; 2021 Sep; 18(11):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 34470914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.