These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31350068)
21. Letter to the editor: The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery. Hsiao TW; Ker CR; Long CY Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Jun; 30(6):1019. PubMed ID: 31037412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Letter to the editor: The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery. Sierra T Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1125. PubMed ID: 31115609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Re: Tension-Free Vaginal Tape-Obturator for Treatment of Pure Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Adverse Effects at 10-Year Follow-up. Wein AJ J Urol; 2018 Feb; 199(2):347-348. PubMed ID: 29357568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Discussion: 'Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and urinary incontinence' by Elser et al. Macones GA; Cahill AG; Stamilio DM; Odibo A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 202(4):e1-3. PubMed ID: 20350636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Urodynamics before surgery for stress urinary incontinence in female patients: An open debate. Finazzi Agro E; Iacovelli V; Illiano E; Costantini E Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Oct; 70(8):691-694. PubMed ID: 28976343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Urodynamics for incontinence after midurethral sling removal. Coskun B; Lavelle RS; Alhalabi F; Lemack G; Zimmern PE Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):939-943. PubMed ID: 26207847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence? Serati M; Cattoni E; Siesto G; Braga A; Sorice P; Cantaluppi S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Vitobello D; Bolis P; Salvatore S BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E344-50. PubMed ID: 23421421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Re: Hilton P, Bryant A, Howel D, McColl E, Buckley BS, Lucas MG, et al. Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: A survey within a mixed methods feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(8):1223-30. Hilton P; Bryant A; Howel D; McColl E; Shen J; Homer T; Vale L; Buckley BS; Lucas MG; Tincello DG; Armstrong N; Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Aug; 35(6):750-1. PubMed ID: 25926153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Re: Total reconstruction. Goeschen K Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Apr; 46(2):175-6; author reply 176. PubMed ID: 16638052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence? Harris N; Swithinbank L; Hayek SA; Yang Q; Abrams P Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Nov; 30(8):1609-12. PubMed ID: 21780164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgery for stress urinary incontinence: so near and yet so far. Costantini E; Lazzeri M Eur Urol; 2011 Jun; 59(6):945-6; discussion 947. PubMed ID: 21316836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Female slings: where do we stand? Bauer RM Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):852-3; discussion 853-4. PubMed ID: 22633361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A re-adjustable sling for female recurrent stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: Long-term results in 205 patients using the Remeex sling system. Errando-Smet C; Ruiz CG; BertrĂ¡n PA; Mavrich HV Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Apr; 37(4):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 29130569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What criteria should urologists use when choosing surgery for stress urinary incontinence? Scarpero H J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1886-7. PubMed ID: 18801536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Kasturi S; Diaz SI; McDermott CD; Woodman PJ; Bump RC; Terry CL; Hale DS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Nov; 205(5):487.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21925638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Chapple CR; Cruz F; Deffieux X; Milani AL; Arlandis S; Artibani W; Bauer RM; Burkhard F; Cardozo L; Castro-Diaz D; Cornu JN; Deprest J; Gunnemann A; Gyhagen M; Heesakkers J; Koelbl H; MacNeil S; Naumann G; Roovers JWR; Salvatore S; Sievert KD; Tarcan T; Van der Aa F; Montorsi F; Wirth M; Abdel-Fattah M Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):424-431. PubMed ID: 28413126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Anatomical entrapment--an unusual cause of 'urinary incontinence'. Ben Nagi J; Robinson D; Cardozo L; Anders K J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Sep; 24(6):709-10. PubMed ID: 16147624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Ogah J; Cody DJ; Rogerson L Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Mar; 30(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 21412819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]