319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31350240)
21. Linked insurance-tumor registry database for health services research.
Doebbeling BN; Wyant DK; McCoy KD; Riggs S; Woolson RF; Wagner D; Wilson RT; Lynch CF
Med Care; 1999 Nov; 37(11):1105-15. PubMed ID: 10549613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A high positive predictive value algorithm using hospital administrative data identified incident cancer cases.
Baldi I; Vicari P; Di Cuonzo D; Zanetti R; Pagano E; Rosato R; Sacerdote C; Segnan N; Merletti F; Ciccone G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 18313562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bias due to false-positive diagnoses in an automated health insurance claims database.
Lanes SF; de Luise C
Drug Saf; 2006; 29(11):1069-75. PubMed ID: 17061912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and evaluation of an algorithm to identify users of Prolia(®) during the early postmarketing period using health insurance claims data.
Hoffman V; Xue F; Gardstein B; Skerry K; Critchlow CW; Enger C
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Sep; 23(9):993-8. PubMed ID: 25052047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Healthcare costs associated with breast cancer in Germany: a claims data analysis.
Kreis K; Plöthner M; Schmidt T; Seufert R; Schreeb K; Jahndel V; Maas S; Kuhlmann A; Zeidler J; Schramm A
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Apr; 21(3):451-464. PubMed ID: 31897812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The accuracy of Japanese claims data in identifying breast cancer cases.
Sato I; Yagata H; Ohashi Y
Biol Pharm Bull; 2015; 38(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 25744458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of body mass index (BMI)-related ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM administrative diagnosis codes recorded in US claims data.
Ammann EM; Kalsekar I; Yoo A; Johnston SS
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1092-1100. PubMed ID: 30003617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of stroke identification algorithm for claims data using the multicenter stroke registry database.
Kim JY; Lee KJ; Kang J; Kim BJ; Han MK; Kim SE; Lee H; Park JM; Kang K; Lee SJ; Kim JG; Cha JK; Kim DH; Park TH; Park MS; Park SS; Lee KB; Park HK; Cho YJ; Hong KS; Choi KH; Kim JT; Kim DE; Ryu WS; Choi JC; Oh MS; Yu KH; Lee BC; Park KY; Lee JS; Jang S; Chae JE; Lee J; Bae HJ;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228997. PubMed ID: 32059039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Algorithms for Cardiovascular Death in Administrative Claims Databases: A Systematic Review.
Singh S; Fouayzi H; Anzuoni K; Goldman L; Min JY; Griffin M; Grijalva CG; Morrow JA; Whitmore CC; Leonard CE; Selvan M; Nair V; Zhou Y; Toh S; Petrone A; Williams J; Fazio-Eynullayeva E; Swain R; Tyler Coyle D; Andrade S
Drug Saf; 2019 Apr; 42(4):515-527. PubMed ID: 30471046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data.
Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Fishman P; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2014 Jul; 52(7):e44-51. PubMed ID: 22922433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Methods for systematic reviews of administrative database studies capturing health outcomes of interest.
McPheeters ML; Sathe NA; Jerome RN; Carnahan RM
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K2-6. PubMed ID: 24331070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chart validation of an algorithm for identifying hereditary progressive muscular dystrophy in healthcare claims.
Chen X; Agiro A; Martin AS; Lucas AM; Haynes K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):174. PubMed ID: 31399066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer.
Meguerditchian AN; Stewart A; Roistacher J; Watroba N; Cropp M; Edge SB
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 101(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 20461766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using administrative or claims data.
Moores KG; Sathe NA
Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31 Suppl 10():K62-73. PubMed ID: 24331075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of Medicare Claim-based Algorithm to Detect Breast, Prostate, or Lung Cancer Bone Metastases.
Sathiakumar N; Delzell E; Yun H; Jooste R; Godby K; Falkson C; Yong M; Kilgore ML
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e144-e149. PubMed ID: 29135778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Determination of interval cancer rates in the German mammography screening program using population-based cancer registry data].
Urbschat I; Heidinger O
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Jan; 57(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24357175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A validation study of a new classification algorithm to identify rheumatoid arthritis using administrative health databases: case-control and cohort diagnostic accuracy studies. Results from the RECord linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study of the Italian Society for Rheumatology.
Carrara G; Scirè CA; Zambon A; Cimmino MA; Cerra C; Caprioli M; Cagnotto G; Nicotra F; Arfè A; Migliazza S; Corrao G; Minisola G; Montecucco C
BMJ Open; 2015 Jan; 5(1):e006029. PubMed ID: 25631308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying ventricular arrhythmias using administrative and claims data.
Tamariz L; Harkins T; Nair V
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21 Suppl 1():148-53. PubMed ID: 22262601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
