377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31350321)
21. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prostate Indeterminate Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Biopsy Versus Surveillance: A Literature Review.
Gómez Rivas J; Giganti F; Álvarez-Maestro M; Freire MJ; Kasivisvanathan V; Martinez-Piñeiro L; Emberton M
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):799-806. PubMed ID: 29525382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/mpMRI for local detection of primary prostate cancer in men with a negative prior biopsy].
Maurer T; Gesterkamp H; Nguyen N; Westenfelder K; Gschwend JE; Budäus L; Rauscher I; Vag T; Weber W; Eiber M
Aktuelle Urol; 2021 Apr; 52(2):143-148. PubMed ID: 32854128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Second Opinion May Reduce the Number of Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Time to Improve Radiologists' Training Program?
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Musi G; Catellani M; Alessi S; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Serino A; Conti A; Pricolo P; Nazzani S; Mirone V; Matei DV; Montanari E; de Cobelli O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Apr; 17(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 30527286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integrated 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Discriminatory Power of Multi-Parametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Al-Bayati M; Grueneisen J; Lütje S; Sawicki LM; Suntharalingam S; Tschirdewahn S; Forsting M; Rübben H; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Wetter A
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 29393268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.
Deniffel D; Abraham N; Namdar K; Dong X; Salinas E; Milot L; Khalvati F; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6867-6876. PubMed ID: 32591889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Active Surveillance Strategies for Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Comparative Benefits and Cost-effectiveness.
Kang SK; Mali RD; Prabhu V; Ferket BS; Loeb S
Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 34254851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer.
Tran V; Hong A; Sutherland T; Taubman K; Lee SF; Lenaghan D; Sethi K; Corcoran NM; Lawrentschuk N; Woo H; Tarlinton L; Bolton D; Spelman T; Thomas L; Booth R; Hegarty J; Perry E; Wong LM
BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e061815. PubMed ID: 36123093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic value of integrated PET/MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer: Comparative study of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT.
Lee MS; Cho JY; Kim SY; Cheon GJ; Moon MH; Oh S; Lee J; Lee S; Woo S; Kim SH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):597-609. PubMed ID: 27586519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: restaging performance of 18F-choline hybrid PET/MRI.
Achard V; Lamanna G; Denis A; De Perrot T; Mainta IC; Ratib O; Iselin C; Miralbell R; Garibotto V; Zilli T
Med Oncol; 2019 Jun; 36(8):67. PubMed ID: 31190232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Sathianathen NJ; Omer A; Harriss E; Davies L; Kasivisvanathan V; Punwani S; Moore CM; Kastner C; Barrett T; Van Den Bergh RC; Eddy BA; Gleeson F; Macpherson R; Bryant RJ; Catto JWF; Murphy DG; Hamdy FC; Ahmed HU; Lamb AD
Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 32444265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
