373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31350321)
41. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of tumor recurrences after radical prostatectomy using 18F-Choline PET/CT and 3T multiparametric MRI without endorectal coil: a single center experience.
Couñago F; Recio M; Maldonado A; Del Cerro E; Díaz-Gavela AA; Thuissard IJ; Sanz-Rosa D; Marcos FJ; Olaciregui K; Mateo M; Cerezo L
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Dec; 16(1):42. PubMed ID: 27927229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS).
Faria R; Soares MO; Spackman E; Ahmed HU; Brown LC; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Sculpher MJ
Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28935163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Intraindividual Comparison of
Kesch C; Vinsensia M; Radtke JP; Schlemmer HP; Heller M; Ellert E; Holland-Letz T; Duensing S; Grabe N; Afshar-Oromieh A; Wieczorek K; Schäfer M; Neels OC; Cardinale J; Kratochwil C; Hohenfellner M; Kopka K; Haberkorn U; Hadaschik BA; Giesel FL
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 28473595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Seo JW; Shin SJ; Taik Oh Y; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W1-W9. PubMed ID: 28418690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The role of mpMRI and PSA density in patients with an initial negative prostatic biopsy.
Kotb AF; Spaner S; Crump T; Hyndman ME
World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2021-2025. PubMed ID: 29808301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic Performance of
Margel D; Bernstine H; Groshar D; Ber Y; Nezrit O; Segal N; Yakimov M; Baniel J; Domachevsky L
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prostate cancer heterogeneity: texture analysis score based on multiple magnetic resonance imaging sequences for detection, stratification and selection of lesions at time of biopsy.
Orczyk C; Villers A; Rusinek H; Lepennec V; Bazille C; Giganti F; Mikheev A; Bernaudin M; Emberton M; Fohlen A; Valable S
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 30378238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of multiple abbreviated multiparametric MRI-derived protocols for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Cereser L; Giannarini G; Bonato F; Pizzolitto S; Como G; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Dal Moro F; Zuiani C; Girometti R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2022 Feb; 74(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 33016030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical utility of (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after radical treatment: results of a multicentre study.
Rodado-Marina S; Coronado-Poggio M; García-Vicente AM; García-Garzón JR; Alonso-Farto JC; de la Jara AC; Maldonado-Suárez A; Rodríguez-Fernández A
BJU Int; 2015 Jun; 115(6):874-83. PubMed ID: 25307619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validation of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Retrospective Analysis.
Nguyentat M; Ushinsky A; Miranda-Aguirre A; Uchio E; Lall C; Shirkhoda L; Lee T; Green C; Houshyar R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018 Nov; 47(6):404-409. PubMed ID: 29126575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Role of
Jiménez Londoño GA; García Vicente AM; Amo-Salas M; Fúnez Mayorga F; López Guerrero MA; Talavera Rubio MP; Gutierrez Martin P; González García B; de la Torre Pérez JA; Soriano Castrejón ÁM
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(4):241-246. PubMed ID: 28330596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy.
Morigi JJ; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Ho B; Nguyen Q; Hruby G; Fogarty G; Jagavkar R; Kneebone A; Hickey A; Fanti S; Tarlinton L; Emmett L
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1185-90. PubMed ID: 26112024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1249-53. PubMed ID: 26699628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59.
Burger IA; Müller J; Donati OF; Ferraro DA; Messerli M; Kranzbühler B; Ter Voert EEGW; Muehlematter UJ; Rupp NJ; Mortezavi A; Eberli D
J Nucl Med; 2019 Aug; 60(8):1118-1123. PubMed ID: 30683764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
