These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31350321)

  • 61. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
    Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
    De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Gleason score at diagnosis predicts the rate of detection of 18F-choline PET/CT performed when biochemical evidence indicates recurrence of prostate cancer: experience with 1,000 patients.
    Cimitan M; Evangelista L; Hodolič M; Mariani G; Baseric T; Bodanza V; Saladini G; Volterrani D; Cervino AR; Gregianin M; Puccini G; Guidoccio F; Fettich J; Borsatti E
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 25552670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
    Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
    Morote J; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semedey ME; Regis L; Planas J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):664-669. PubMed ID: 31411977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67.
    Kanoun S; Walker P; Vrigneaud JM; Depardon E; Barbier V; Humbert O; Moulin M; Créhange G; Cormier L; Loffroy R; Brunotte F; Cochet A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Apr; 97(5):986-994. PubMed ID: 28333020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
    Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
    BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study.
    Getaneh AM; Heijnsdijk EAM; de Koning HJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1801. PubMed ID: 33469144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
    Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effect of Combined
    Taneja S; Jena A; Taneja R; Singh A; Ahuja A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 29528713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis and reducing unnecessary biopsies with [
    Fu Y; Zhao M; Chen J; Wen Q; Chen B
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15525. PubMed ID: 38969741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
    Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Implementation of a 5-Minute Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Protocol for Prostate Cancer in Men With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Before Biopsy.
    Weiss J; Martirosian P; Notohamiprodjo M; Kaufmann S; Othman AE; Grosse U; Nikolaou K; Gatidis S
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):186-190. PubMed ID: 29077588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
    Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
    Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.