BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31351362)

  • 1. How do actors with asymmetrical power assert authority in policy agenda-setting? A study of authority claims by health actors in trade policy.
    Townsend B; Schram A; Labonté R; Baum F; Friel S
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 236():112430. PubMed ID: 31351362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership.
    Townsend B; Friel S; Schram A; Baum F; Labonté R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Oct; 10(10):613-624. PubMed ID: 32610761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exposé of the realpolitik of trade negotiations: implications for population nutrition.
    Friel S; Baker P; Thow AM; Gleeson D; Townsend B; Schram A
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Nov; 22(16):3083-3091. PubMed ID: 31439059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing a health equity agenda across multiple policy domains: a qualitative policy analysis of social, trade and welfare policy.
    Townsend B; Friel S; Freeman T; Schram A; Strazdins L; Labonte R; Mackean T; Baum F
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e040180. PubMed ID: 33158831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy.
    Townsend B; Tenni BF; Goldman S; Gleeson D
    Global Health; 2023 Aug; 19(1):60. PubMed ID: 37612767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study.
    Baker P; Gill T; Friel S; Carey G; Kay A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():141-149. PubMed ID: 28161671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-communicable disease governance in the era of the sustainable development goals: a qualitative analysis of food industry framing in WHO consultations.
    Lauber K; Ralston R; Mialon M; Carriedo A; Gilmore AB
    Global Health; 2020 Aug; 16(1):76. PubMed ID: 32847604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Food industry political practices in Chile: "the economy has always been the main concern".
    Mialon M; Corvalan C; Cediel G; Scagliusi FB; Reyes M
    Global Health; 2020 Oct; 16(1):107. PubMed ID: 33109216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trade and nutrition policy coherence: a framing analysis and Australian case study.
    Baker P; Friel S; Gleeson D; Thow AM; Labonte R
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Aug; 22(12):2329-2337. PubMed ID: 31111806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model.
    Cullerton K; Donnet T; Lee A; Gallegos D
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Aug; 15(1):83. PubMed ID: 30170610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of policy actors and contextual factors in policy agenda setting and formulation: maternal fee exemption policies in Ghana over four and a half decades.
    Koduah A; van Dijk H; Agyepong IA
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2015 May; 13():27. PubMed ID: 26022699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defending access to medicines in regional trade agreements: lessons from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership - a qualitative study of policy actors' views.
    Townsend B
    Global Health; 2021 Jul; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 34238347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corporate political activity in the context of unhealthy food advertising restrictions across Transport for London: A qualitative case study.
    Lauber K; Hunt D; Gilmore AB; Rutter H
    PLoS Med; 2021 Sep; 18(9):e1003695. PubMed ID: 34473694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".
    Thow AM; Gleeson D
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 May; 6(5):295-298. PubMed ID: 28812819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can multiple frames enable action on social determinants? Lessons from Australia's paid parental leave.
    Townsend B; Friel S; Baker P; Baum F; Strazdins L
    Health Promot Int; 2020 Oct; 35(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 31529093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Authority in tobacco control in Pacific Small Island Developing States: a qualitative study of multisectoral tobacco governance in Fiji and Vanuatu.
    Patay D; Schram A; Collin J; Sell S; Friel S
    Tob Control; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35882520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normalizing Tobacco? The Politics of Trade, Investment, and Tobacco Control.
    Jarman H
    Milbank Q; 2019 Jun; 97(2):449-479. PubMed ID: 31099058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corporate power and the international trade regime preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review.
    Milsom P; Smith R; Baker P; Walls H
    Health Policy Plan; 2021 May; 36(4):493-508. PubMed ID: 33276385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does international trade and investment liberalization facilitate corporate power in nutrition and alcohol policymaking? Applying an integrated political economy and power analysis approach to a case study of South Africa.
    Milsom P; Smith R; Modisenyane SM; Walls H
    Global Health; 2022 Mar; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 35279184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public health over private wealth: rebalancing public and private interests in international trade and investment agreements.
    Schram A; Townsend B; Youde J; Friel S
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Sep; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 31569202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.