These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3135145)

  • 1. Current problems in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Washington JA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Mar; 9(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 3135145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008 and 2010 guidelines in interpreting susceptibility of enterobacteriaceae isolates.
    Agrawal GN; Shevade SU
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2014; 57(3):518-9. PubMed ID: 25118774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Consensus for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Enterobacteriaceae. Subcommittee on Antimicrobials, SADEBAC (Argentinian Society of Clinical Bacteriology), Argentinian Association of Microbiology].
    Famiglietti A; Quinteros M; Vázquez M; Marín M; Nicola F; Radice M; Galas M; Pasterán F; Bantar C; Casellas JM; Kovensky Pupko J; Couto E; Goldberg M; Lopardo H; Gutkind G; Soloaga R;
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2005; 37(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 15991480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breakpoint to MIC quotient: A parameter to rapidly evaluate the in vitro bactericidal activity of β-lactams on Enterobacteriaceae.
    Grillon A; Chabaud A; Zambardi G; Caniaux I; Jehl F
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2019 May; 53(5):674-677. PubMed ID: 30716447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Standardized disk tests for the determination of bacterial resistance ].
    von Graevenitz A; Heitz M; Lüthy R; Meyer J; Vischer W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1984 Aug; 114(31-32):1079-86. PubMed ID: 6436967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility test breakpoints of national societies.
    Degener JE; Phillips I
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Feb; 7(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 11298142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of Potential β-Lactam Surrogates To Predict
    Hackel MA; Iaconis JP; Karlowsky JA; Sahm DF
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 29436424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect ertapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: VITEK2, MicroScan, Etest, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution.
    Lee M; Chung HS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():87-91. PubMed ID: 25794901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cefazolin and enterobacteriaceae: rationale for revised susceptibility testing breakpoints.
    Turnidge JD;
    Clin Infect Dis; 2011 Apr; 52(7):917-24. PubMed ID: 21427400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temocillin susceptibility by BSAC methodology.
    Andrews JM; Jevons G; Walker R; Ashby J; Fraise AP
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Jul; 60(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 17550891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disagreements between disc diffusion, and MIC-based susceptibility categorizations of ertapenem versus ESBL producers.
    Samuel JR; Natarajan M; Rizkalla E; Livermore DM; Warner M; Jenkinson P
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):984-5. PubMed ID: 16188914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Drug selection for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (author's transl)].
    Kobayashi A
    Rinsho Byori; 1979 May; 27(5):385-92. PubMed ID: 114698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimicrobial activity of beta-lactams against multiresistant micro-organisms from the family Enterobacteriaceae, and genus Pseudomonas.
    Niebla A; González I; Vallín C
    Microbios; 1994; 80(325):245-50. PubMed ID: 7700163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of the Etest for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa toward Ceftazidime-Avibactam.
    Kresken M; Körber-Irrgang B
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 56(9):. PubMed ID: 29899002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consensus statement on the adherence to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines (CLSI-2010 and CLSI-2010-update) for Enterobacteriaceae in clinical microbiology laboratories in Taiwan.
    Hsueh PR; Ko WC; Wu JJ; Lu JJ; Wang FD; Wu HY; Wu TL; Teng LJ
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Oct; 43(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 21075714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do patient data really support the clinical and laboratory standards institute recommendation for lowering third-generation cephalosporin interpretive breakpoints?
    Tamma PD; Powers JH
    Clin Infect Dis; 2013 Aug; 57(4):624-5. PubMed ID: 23658433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of CLSI Breakpoint Changes on Microbiology Laboratories and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.
    Heil EL; Johnson JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 54(4):840-4. PubMed ID: 26791363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Phoenix automated system, the Etest method and broth microdilution in determining temocillin susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Patel TA; Dilley R; Williams A; Vanstone GL; Balakrishnan I
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2013 Jul; 68(7):1685-6. PubMed ID: 23416956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint changes on susceptibility rates of cephalosporins in uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae.
    Bunnell KL; Wenzler E; Harrington AT; Danziger LH
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Apr; 90(4):335-336. PubMed ID: 29395714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antimicrobial susceptibility determination by an automated conductance technique.
    Baynes NC; Comrie J; Harper IA
    Med Lab Sci; 1986 Jul; 43(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 3807680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.