These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31351704)
1. Lumbar interbody fusion rates with 3D-printed lamellar titanium cages using a silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone graft. Mokawem M; Katzouraki G; Harman CL; Lee R J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 68():134-139. PubMed ID: 31351704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance. Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision for Endoscopic Diskectomy: Is Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion an Option? Qiao G; Feng M; Wang X; Liu J; Ge M; Yang B; Yue B World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e26-e30. PubMed ID: 31398523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model. Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an increased strut porosity silicate-substituted calcium phosphate, SiCaP EP, as a synthetic bone graft substitute in spinal fusion surgery: a prospective, open-label study. Bolger C; Jones D; Czop S Eur Spine J; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1733-1742. PubMed ID: 30834972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity. Strong MJ; Yee TJ; Khalsa SSS; Saadeh YS; Swong KN; Kashlan ON; Szerlip NJ; Park P; Oppenlander ME Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E4. PubMed ID: 32871568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial. Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft replacement for spinal fusion procedures. Nagineni VV; James AR; Alimi M; Hofstetter C; Shin BJ; Njoku I; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):E1264-72. PubMed ID: 22744618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages. Zhong HZ; Tian DS; Zhou Y; Jing JH; Qian J; Chen L; Zhu B Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1211-8. PubMed ID: 26830783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (SiCaP) bone grafts in spinal fusion: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cottrill E; Premananthan C; Pennington Z; Ehresman J; Theodore N; Sciubba DM; Witham T J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 81():353-366. PubMed ID: 33222944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study. Wang Z; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Miao J Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38431. PubMed ID: 38905365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation. Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up. Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes? Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis. Kurra S; Lavelle WF; Silverstein MP; Savage JW; Orr RD Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 29174460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing radiographic and clinical outcomes between stand-alone lateral interbody lumbar fusion with either silicate calcium phosphate or rh-BMP2. Pimenta L; Marchi L; Oliveira L; Coutinho E; Amaral R J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 74(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 23444134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence. Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]