These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31351908)

  • 1. The effects of nanofilled resin-based coatings on the physical properties of glass ionomer cement restorative materials.
    Jafarpour D; Mese A; Ferooz M; Bagheri R
    J Dent; 2019 Oct; 89():103177. PubMed ID: 31351908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility of restorative materials to staining by common beverages: an in vitro study.
    Ayad NM
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 19655568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water sorption and solubility of core build-up materials.
    Zankuli MA; Devlin H; Silikas N
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e324-9. PubMed ID: 25205365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solubility and sorption of resin-based luting cements.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; McMillen K; Clelland N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 11203853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials.
    Savas S; Colgecen O; Yasa B; Kucukyilmaz E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):824-832. PubMed ID: 31187769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Fuentes V; Prati C; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12615019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Water sorption and water solubility of current luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Mar; 39(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 18618025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Cattani-Lorente MA; Dupuis V; Payan J; Moya F; Meyer JM
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 10483398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating.
    Lohbauer U; Krämer N; Siedschlag G; Schubert EW; Lauerer B; Müller FA; Petschelt A; Ebert J
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 21698994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weight change of various light-cured restorative materials after water immersion.
    Iwami Y; Yamamoto H; Sato W; Kawai K; Torii M; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 9656924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protective effect of resin coating on the microleakage of Class V restorations following treatment with carbamide peroxide in vitro.
    Yu H; Li Q; Attin T; Wang Y
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 21180002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions.
    Meşe A; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Sep; 27(5):702-9. PubMed ID: 18972787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compressive fatigue limit of four types of dental restorative materials.
    Chen S; Öhman C; Jefferies SR; Gray H; Xia W; Engqvist H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():283-289. PubMed ID: 27085845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An
    Bethapudy DR; Bhat C; Lakade L; Chaudhary S; Kunte S; Patil S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 37457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.