These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31352559)
1. Impact of two formulas to calculate percentage diameter stenosis of coronary lesions: from stenosis models (phantom lesion model) to actual clinical lesions. Hideo-Kajita A; Wopperer S; Beyene SS; Meirovich YF; Melaku GD; Kuku KO; Brathwaite EJ; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Torguson R; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 35(12):2139-2146. PubMed ID: 31352559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye. Sen T; Kilit C; Astarcioglu MA; Asarcikli LD; Aksu T; Kafes H; Parspur A; Gozubuyuk G; Amasyali B Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions. Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting. Ishibashi Y; Grundeken MJ; Nakatani S; Iqbal J; Morel MA; Généreux P; Girasis C; Wentzel JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 85(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25059819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club. Girasis C; Onuma Y; Schuurbiers JC; Morel MA; van Es GA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 79(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 22072537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from single-source dual-energy CT on coronary stenosis quantification. Stehli J; Clerc OF; Fuchs TA; Possner M; Gräni C; Benz DC; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 26754621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning assessment of myocardial ischemia using angiography: Development and retrospective validation. Hae H; Kang SJ; Kim WJ; Choi SY; Lee JG; Bae Y; Cho H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Lee CH; Kang DY; Lee PH; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ PLoS Med; 2018 Nov; 15(11):e1002693. PubMed ID: 30422987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: Comparison with standard angiographic estimation. Rigatelli G; Zuin M; Ronco F; Caprioglio F; Cavazzini D; Giatti S; Braggion G; Perilli S; Nguyen VT Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):751-754. PubMed ID: 29706477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic analysis on the relationship between luminal enhancement, convolution kernel, plaque density, and luminal diameter of coronary artery stenosis: a CT phantom study. Morsbach F; Berger N; Desbiolles L; Poropat T; Leschka S; Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23329389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative atherosclerotic plaque volume by CT coronary angiography trumps conventional stenosis assessment for identifying flow-limiting lesions. Kato N; Kishi S; Arbab-Zadeh A; Rybicki FJ; Tanimoto S; Aoki J; Watanabe M; Horiuchi Y; Furui K; Hara K; Ibukuro K; Lima JAC; Tanabe K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1847-1855. PubMed ID: 28597124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]