259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31353300)
21. Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.
Chen X; Reddy AS; Kontaxis A; Choi DS; Wright T; Dines DM; Warren RF; Berhouet J; Gulotta LV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3090-3099. PubMed ID: 28948516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis of implant position following total shoulder arthroplasty.
Ricchetti ET; Jun BJ; Cain RA; Youderian A; Rodriguez EJ; Kusin D; Subhas N; Patterson TE; Iannotti JP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6):983-992. PubMed ID: 29426742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.
Guehring T; Navas L; Westrich J; Zimmerer A; Schmidt S; Barrientos M; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4763-4772. PubMed ID: 36705760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.
Iannotti J; Baker J; Rodriguez E; Brems J; Ricchetti E; Mesiha M; Bryan J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e71. PubMed ID: 24806017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computed tomography revealed the correlation between radiolucency and alignment of all-polyethylene pegged glenoid component more than 10 years after total shoulder arthroplasty in the Japanese population.
Matsui Y; Momma D; Suenaga N; Urita A; Yoshioka C; Oizumi N; Iwasaki N
J Orthop Sci; 2023 Jan; 28(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 34838411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Managing Glenoid Deformity in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Role of New Technology (Computer-Assisted Navigation and Patient-Specific Instrumentation).
Virk MS; Steinmann SP; Romeo AA; Zuckerman JD
Instr Course Lect; 2020; 69():583-594. PubMed ID: 32017753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.
Ricchetti ET; Jun BJ; Jin Y; Ho JC; Patterson TE; Dalton JE; Derwin KA; Iannotti JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Aug; 103(15):1417-1430. PubMed ID: 33835109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a B2 glenoid addressed with corrective reaming.
Orvets ND; Chamberlain AM; Patterson BM; Chalmers PN; Gosselin M; Salazar D; Aleem AW; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jun; 27(6S):S58-S64. PubMed ID: 29501223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Porous metal wedge augments to address glenoid retroversion in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: midterm update.
Sandow MJ; Tu CG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 32305149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intraoperative navigation system use increases accuracy of glenoid component inclination but not functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study.
Gaj E; Pagnotta SM; Berlinberg EJ; Patel HH; Picconi O; Redler A; De Carli A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 37650896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hsu CP; Wu CT; Chen CY; Lin SC; Hsu KY
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):4065-4075. PubMed ID: 36445496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduction of scapulohumeral subluxation with posterior augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: Short-term 3D comparison between pre- and post-operative CT.
Terrier A; Goetti P; Becce F; Farron A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 106(4):681-686. PubMed ID: 32284278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in preoperative planning of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Rohrs E; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2610-2618. PubMed ID: 33190760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem.
Lau SC; Keith PPA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 28927670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shoulder patient-specific guide: First experience in 10 patients indicates room for improvement.
Berhouet J; Rol M; Spiry C; Slimane M; Chevalier C; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 104(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study.
Stübig T; Petri M; Zeckey C; Hawi N; Krettek C; Citak M; Meller R
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 23908109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
