219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31353466)
1. Comparison of the AV Magnivisualizer device with colposcopy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the Swede scoring system.
Dayal U; Gupta B; Hariprasad R; Shriya R; Rajaram S; Prasad B; Mehrotra R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 31353466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colposcopy telemedicine: live versus static swede score and accuracy in detecting CIN2+, a cross-sectional pilot study.
Taghavi K; Banerjee D; Mandal R; Kallner HK; Thorsell M; Friis T; Kocoska-Maras L; Strander B; Singer A; Wikström E
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 29890991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial.
Nessa A; Wistrand C; Begum SA; Thuresson M; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 24326529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can visual inspection with acetic acid under magnification substitute colposcopy in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in low-resource settings?
Aggarwal P; Batra S; Gandhi G; Zutshi V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 20865420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of Swede score colposcopy scoring system and histopathological results in patients with high-risk HPV infection other than HPV16 and 18.
Alan M; Gunyeli I; Gultekin M; Sancı M; Yuce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31792083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.
Natarajan J; Mathur S; Vishnubhatla S; Kumar S; Vashist S; Ramanujam N; Singhal S; Meena J; Tanwar P; Bhatla N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Dec; 23(12):4013-4021. PubMed ID: 36579981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The CryoPop study: Screening for high-grade cervical dysplasia in Karnataka, India.
Anderson JR; Yogeshkumar S; Lu E; Yenokyan G; Thaler K; Mensa M; Chikaraddi S; Lokare L; Gudadinni MR; Antartani R; Donimath K; Patil B; Bidri S; Goudar SS; Derman R; Dalal A;
BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):158-167. PubMed ID: 37932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the Swede score to predict cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with HIV-1 in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Maringa VD; Chikandiwa A; Gilham C; Mbodi L; Kelly H; Mayaud P; Delany-Moretlwe S; Adam Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 152(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 32976629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of portable colposcopy and human papillomavirus testing for screening of cervical cancer in rural China.
Newman H; Hu J; Li X; He J; Bradford L; Shan S; Wu X; Zhu B; Yang W; Fu B; Zhu B; Gao G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 30640679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study.
Jayabalan S; Subbaiah M; Chaturvedula L
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2023 Jul; 66(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 37365989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India.
Basu PS; Sankaranarayanan R; Mandal R; Roy C; Das P; Choudhury D; Bhattacharya D; Chatterjee R; Dutta K; Barik S; Tsu V; Chakrabarti RN; Siddiqi M;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 14675346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.
Joshi S; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Kulkarni V; Somanathan T; Divate U
AIDS; 2013 Feb; 27(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 23079814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characteristics of invisible cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ under colposcopy].
Chen Q; Du H; Wang C; Tang JL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):172-177. PubMed ID: 29609231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.
He Y; Zhao Q; Geng YN; Yang SL; Yin CH; Wu YM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Apr; 96(17):e6700. PubMed ID: 28445274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histological diagnosis and evaluation of the Swede score colposcopic system in a large cohort of pregnant women with atypical cervical cytology or cervical malignancy signs.
Kärrberg C; Ryd W; Strander B; Brännström M; Rådberg T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):952-8. PubMed ID: 22582977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of Swede Score and 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature in Women with Abnormal Cytology.
Campos PL; Guimarães ICCDV; Fialho SCAV; Martins CAO; Rodrigues FR; Velarde LGC; Monteiro DDSA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 44(10):938-944. PubMed ID: 36446560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
