219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31353466)
21. Association of Swede Score and 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature in Women with Abnormal Cytology.
Campos PL; Guimarães ICCDV; Fialho SCAV; Martins CAO; Rodrigues FR; Velarde LGC; Monteiro DDSA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 44(10):938-944. PubMed ID: 36446560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy.
Tidy JA; Brown BH; Healey TJ; Daayana S; Martin M; Prendiville W; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2013 Mar; 120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. PubMed ID: 23289897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+).
Dorji N; Tshering S; Choden S; Chhetri M; Bhujel D; Wangden T; Pradhan B; Bhutia PC; Tshomo U
BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):930. PubMed ID: 36038826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of various screening techniques in detecting preinvasive lesions of the cervix among symptomatic women and women having unhealthy cervix.
Nayak PK; Mitra S; Agrawal S; Hussain N; Thakur P; Mishra B
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(1):180-185. PubMed ID: 33723152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [A study of cervical cancer screening algorithms].
Zhao FH; Zhang WH; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Chen W; Liu B; Ma JF; Hu SY; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 32(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 20819481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.
Nessa A; Roy JS; Chowdhury MA; Khanam Q; Afroz R; Wistrand C; Thuresson M; Thorsell M; Shemer I; Wikström Shemer EA
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005313. PubMed ID: 25366674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 25824759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual Inspection of Cervix With Acetic Acid as a Screening Modality for Cervical Cancer.
Nooh AM; Mohamed Mel-S; El-Alfy Y
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 26247262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endocervicoscopy in Identifying and Grading Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Lesion.
De Rosa N; Lavitola G; Della Corte L; Bifulco G
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 32182612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual inspection with acetic acid as a feasible screening test for cervical neoplasia in Iran.
Ghaemmaghami F; Behtash N; Modares Gilani M; Mousavi A; Marjani M; Moghimi R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 15228419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single step "See and Treat" strategy might be replacing the "conventional three step strategy" in management of preinvasive cervical lesions at tertiary center: A North Indian study.
Sachan R; Shukla A; Patel ML; Sachan P; Verma M; Singh U
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1541-1547. PubMed ID: 36412407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating Colposcopy with Dynamic Spectral Imaging During Routine Practice at Five Colposcopy Clinics in Wales: Clinical Performance.
Budithi S; Peevor R; Pugh D; Papagiannakis E; Durman A; Banu N; Alalade A; Leeson S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 29539625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of colposcopy vs cytology as secondary test to triage women found positive on visual inspection test.
Pimple SA; Amin G; Goswami S; Shastri SS
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20587908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity of the colposcopic criteria inner border sign, ridge sign, and rag sign for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Vercellino GF; Erdemoglu E; Chiantera V; Vasiljeva K; Drechsler I; Cichon G; Schneider A; Böhmer G
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):624-631. PubMed ID: 23635627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid.
Belinson JL; Pretorius RG; Zhang WH; Wu LY; Qiao YL; Elson P
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 98(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 11530126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wojciech R
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 21957606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. "Screen and Treat" Approach among VIA Positive Women during Cervical Cancer Screening Program: Experience at Low Resource Setting.
Shahnaz S; Hira HM; Begum KN; Akhter R; Sharmin S
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1100-1106. PubMed ID: 34605483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid to detect cervical cancer precursors among HIV-infected women in Kenya.
Huchko MJ; Sneden J; Sawaya G; Smith-McCune K; Maloba M; Abdulrahim N; Bukusi EA; Cohen CR
Int J Cancer; 2015 Jan; 136(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 24889387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
